Leaderboards

FY2026 ended Sep 30 · data still posting · data as of 2026-11-01†

† DoD contract data posts to USAspending about 90 days after award.

Computed rankings of federal spending for FY2026 (data still posting). Each figure is aggregated by us from USASpending source records Computed and every row opens its own page in the graph. Combined corporate families count once; USASpending privacy-aggregation buckets are set aside.

Fastest-growing recipients

≈ computed · year over year

Biggest jump in obligations from FY2024 to FY2025, among recipients with at least $50M in both years (so a small base can't manufacture a runaway percentage).

  1. 1▲ 1076%
  2. 2
    Bccg a Joint Venture$287M → $3.1B
    ▲ 989%
  3. 3▲ 810%
  4. 4▲ 482%
  5. 5▲ 438%
  6. 6▲ 399%
  7. 7▲ 361%
  8. 8▲ 351%
  9. 9
    Aevex Aerospace, LLC$152.3M → $676.9M
    ▲ 344%
  10. 10▲ 321%
See the full ranking →

Most single-agency-dependent recipients

≈ computed · concentration

Recipients (above $100M) that draw all or nearly all of their federal dollars from a single funding agency, largest first. A high share describes the relationship, not a judgment about it.

  1. 1
    California Department of Health Care Services$117.3B from Health and Human Services
    100%
  2. 2
    Ohio Department of Medicaid$29B from Health and Human Services
    100%
  3. 3
    Florida Agency for Health Care Administration$27.9B from Health and Human Services
    100%
  4. 4
    Illinois Department of Healthcare & Family Services$25.5B from Health and Human Services
    100%
  5. 5
    Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System$18.9B from Health and Human Services
    100%
  6. 6
    VA Department of Medical Assistance Service$16.8B from Health and Human Services
    100%
  7. 7
    Georgia Department of Community Health$14.9B from Health and Human Services
    100%
  8. 8
    Lousiana Department of Health$14.6B from Health and Human Services
    100%
  9. 9
    Fisher Sand & Gravel CO$13.4B from Homeland Security
    100%
  10. 10
    Finance & Administration Tennessee Depar$12.2B from Health and Human Services
    100%
See the full ranking →

Most non-competed contractors (no-bid)

≈ computed · non-competed share

The largest share of contract dollars awarded WITHOUT competition, among recipients with at least $500M in federal contracts. From FPDS extent-competed codes; a high share often reflects sole-source or specialized work, not wrongdoing.

  1. 1
    Davie Defense Inc.$3.5B of $3.5B in contracts
    100%
  2. 2
    Oracle Health Government Services, Inc.$2.1B of $2.1B in contracts
    100%
  3. 3
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology$1.4B of $1.4B in contracts
    100%
  4. 4
    Rauma Marine Constructions Oy$1.1B of $1.1B in contracts
    100%
  5. 5
    The Aerospace Corporation$1.1B of $1.1B in contracts
    100%
  6. 6
    Bell Boeing Joint Project Office$1.4B of $1.4B in contracts
    100%
  7. 7
    The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc.$614.5M of $623.6M in contracts
    99%
  8. 898%
  9. 9
    The Leland Stanford Junior University$745.9M of $760.1M in contracts
    98%
  10. 10
    Rohde & Schwarz USA, Inc.$677.7M of $696.4M in contracts
    97%
See the full ranking →

Top federal contractors

≈ computed · contract dollars

The biggest holders of federal contracts this year, ranked by contract-coded obligations (so entitlement grants to state agencies don't crowd out the primes).

  1. 1$54.5B
  2. 2
    RTX Corporation42 industries
    $32.7B
  3. 3
    The Boeing Company37 industries
    $27.8B
  4. 4$27.5B
  5. 5
    UnitedHealth Group8 industries
    $24.9B
  6. 6$16.6B
  7. 7$14.9B
  8. 8$14B
  9. 9$13.4B
  10. 10
    Leidos, Inc.35 industries
    $9.1B
See the full ranking →

Biggest contracts

≈ computed · total contract value

The largest individual contracts and contract vehicles by total value over their life (base plus all options): a multi-year vehicle can dwarf any one fiscal year's obligations.

  1. 1
    Contract HT940216C0001Humana Government Business Inc
    $51.3B
  2. 2
    Contract DEAC0494AL85000Lockheed Martin Corp
    $48.1B
  3. 3
    National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (Ntess)…National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC
    $43.5B
  4. 4$43B
  5. 5$42.2B
  6. 6$36.3B
  7. 7$35.7B
  8. 8
    M&o of Lanl BR of U of CAThe Regents of the University of California
    $35.3B
  9. 9$35.2B
  10. 10
    LRIP Lot 12 Advance Acquisition ContractLockheed Martin Corporation
    $35.1B
See the full ranking →

Where the money concentrates

≈ computed · by state

States ranked by the total value of federal work performed there. Place of performance is reliably reported at the state level; congressional-district figures are inferred and live on their own pages.

  1. 1$496.3B
  2. 2$347.9B
  3. 3$336.9B
  4. 4$293.3B
  5. 5$270.2B
  6. 6$245.5B
  7. 7$207B
  8. 8$206.8B
  9. 9$202B
  10. 10$151.9B
See the full ranking →

Contractors giving the most through their PAC

≈ computed · PAC money to Congress

Federal contractors ranked by how much their political action committee gave to members of Congress, from FEC records. A contribution is a public, disclosed fact placed beside the contracts: context, not a claim of influence.

  1. 1
    Honeywell International Inc.to 398 members of Congress
    $6.1M
  2. 2
    Lockheed Martin Corporationto 414 members of Congress
    $4.9M
  3. 3
    United Parcel Service Co.to 391 members of Congress
    $4.8M
  4. 4
    The Boeing Companyto 375 members of Congress
    $4.8M
  5. 5
    Raytheon Companyto 338 members of Congress
    $4.3M
  6. 6
    General Dynamics Corporationto 342 members of Congress
    $4.1M
  7. 7
    General Motors LLCto 328 members of Congress
    $3M
  8. 8
    UnitedHealth Groupto 268 members of Congress
    $2.7M
  9. 9
    L3Harris Technologies, Inc.to 228 members of Congress
    $2.6M
  10. 10
    Space Exploration Technologies Corp.to 258 members of Congress
    $2.6M
See the full ranking →

Largest single awards of FY2026

✓ from source · one award each

The biggest INDIVIDUAL contracts and grants whose latest action falls in FY2026, by obligated value. One award per row, not a company's yearly total.

  1. 1
    Medicaid Entitlement for 7 - Fy 2026 - T19California Department of Health Care Services
    $110.4B
  2. 2$61.3B
  3. 3$36.9B
  4. 4
    Medicaid Entitlement for 46 - Fy 2026 - T19PA Department of Human Services
    $31.8B
  5. 5$28.2B
  6. 6
    Medicaid Entitlement for 14 - Fy 2026 - T19Florida Agency for Health Care Administration
    $27.1B
  7. 7
    Medicaid Entitlement for 35 - Fy 2026 - T19North Carolina Department of Health & Human Services
    $25.9B
  8. 8
    Medicaid Entitlement for 20 - Fy 2026 - T19Illinois Department of Healthcare & Family Services
    $23.2B
  9. 9
    Medicaid Entitlement for 30 - Fy 2026 - T19Michigan Department of Health and Human Services
    $21.7B
  10. 10
    Medicaid Entitlement for 59 - Fy 2026 - T19Department of Social & Health Services
    $19.7B
See the full ranking →

Most geographically concentrated agencies

≈ computed · share in one state

The share of an agency's award dollars on record here that land in a single state. Computed from the individual award records we hold, pairing each award's awarding agency with its own reported place of performance.

  1. 1
    Department of Veterans Affairs$33.2B of $58.3B in VA
    57%
  2. 2
    Department of Homeland Security$26.1B of $46.5B in TX
    56%
  3. 352%
  4. 4
    Department of Energy$1.8B of $4.1B in MD
    43%
  5. 529%
  6. 627%
  7. 7
    Department of Defense$16.6B of $79.6B in TX
    21%
  8. 8
    Department of Transportation$5.4B of $32.2B in CA
    17%
  9. 9
    Department of the Interior$312.9M of $1.9B in NM
    17%
  10. 1016%
See the full ranking →

Agencies by grant vs contract mix

≈ computed · assistance share

How lopsided each agency is between buying things and funding them: assistance dollars against contract dollars, most grant-heavy first.

  1. 1
    Social Security Administration$1.7T assistance vs $1.8B contracts
    100% grants
  2. 2
    Railroad Retirement Board$14.7B assistance vs $44.4M contracts
    100% grants
  3. 3
    Department of Health and Human Services$2.1T assistance vs $22.3B contracts
    99% grants
  4. 4
    Department of Housing and Urban Development$73.7B assistance vs $1B contracts
    99% grants
  5. 5
    Federal Communications Commission$10.3B assistance vs $163.3M contracts
    98% grants
  6. 6
    Department of Education$84.2B assistance vs $2.7B contracts
    97% grants
  7. 7
    Department of Agriculture$147B assistance vs $6B contracts
    96% grants
  8. 8
    Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation$4.2B assistance vs $222.4M contracts
    95% grants
  9. 9
    Environmental Protection Agency$16.3B assistance vs $1.1B contracts
    94% grants
  10. 10
    National Science Foundation$5.9B assistance vs $599.4M contracts
    91% grants
See the full ranking →

Congressional committees ranked by the obligations of the agencies within their jurisdiction. Oversight is a formal responsibility, not control of any particular award.

  1. 1
    House Committee on Appropriations10 agencies in jurisdiction
    $3.5T
  2. 2
    Senate Committee on Appropriations10 agencies in jurisdiction
    $3.5T
  3. 3
    House Committee on Energy and Commerce2 agencies in jurisdiction
    $2.3T
  4. 4
    House Committee on Ways and Means1 agency in jurisdiction
    $2.2T
  5. 5
    Senate Committee on Finance1 agency in jurisdiction
    $2.2T
  6. 6$2.2T
  7. 7
    House Committee on Armed Services1 agency in jurisdiction
    $416.4B
  8. 8
    Senate Committee on Armed Services1 agency in jurisdiction
    $416.4B
  9. 9
    House Committee on Veterans' Affairs1 agency in jurisdiction
    $319.2B
  10. 10$319.2B
See the full ranking →
Why the labels? The graph is only worth anything if the links are trusted. Facts taken straight from a federal filing are Source; figures we calculate are Computed; links we infer (corporate parents, districts, similar contractors, connections between records) are Inferred, worded carefully, never asserted as fact and never a claim that one thing caused another. Spot an error? Tell us.