TheFiscalFinder

Leaderboards

Computed rankings of federal spending for FY2025. Each figure is aggregated by us from USASpending source records ≈ computed and every row opens its own page in the graph. Combined corporate families count once; USASpending privacy-aggregation buckets are set aside.

Fastest-growing recipients

≈ computed · year over year

Biggest jump in obligations from FY2024 to FY2025, among recipients with at least $50M in both years (so a small base can't manufacture a runaway percentage).

  1. 1▲ 1076%
  2. 2
    Bccg a Joint Venture$287M → $3.1B
    ▲ 989%
  3. 3▲ 810%
  4. 4▲ 482%
  5. 5▲ 438%
  6. 6▲ 399%
  7. 7▲ 361%
  8. 8▲ 351%
  9. 9
    Aevex Aerospace, LLC$152.3M → $676.9M
    ▲ 344%
  10. 10▲ 321%
See the full ranking →

Most single-agency-dependent recipients

≈ computed · concentration

Recipients (above $100M) that draw all or nearly all of their federal dollars from a single funding agency, largest first. A high share describes the relationship, not a judgment about it.

  1. 1
    Health Care Services, California Department of$112.5B from Health and Human Services
    100%
  2. 2
    Ohio Department of Medicaid$27.7B from Health and Human Services
    100%
  3. 3
    Florida Agency for Health Care Administration$22.8B from Health and Human Services
    100%
  4. 4
    Illinois Department of Healthcare & Family Services$21.9B from Health and Human Services
    100%
  5. 5
    VA Department of Medical Assistance Service$17.2B from Health and Human Services
    100%
  6. 6
    Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System$16.4B from Health and Human Services
    100%
  7. 7
    National Railroad Passenger Corporation$15.2B from Transportation
    100%
  8. 8
    Lousiana Department of Health$14.6B from Health and Human Services
    100%
  9. 9
    Georgia Department of Community Health$13B from Health and Human Services
    100%
  10. 10
    Finance & Administration Tennessee Depar$11.9B from Health and Human Services
    100%
See the full ranking →

Most single-source contractors

≈ computed · no-bid share

The largest share of contract dollars awarded WITHOUT competition, among recipients with at least $500M in federal contracts. From FPDS extent-competed codes; a high share often reflects sole-source or specialized work, not wrongdoing.

  1. 1
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology$1.4B of $1.4B in contracts
    100%
  2. 2100%
  3. 3
    Raytheon/Lockheed Martin Javelin JV$928.4M of $928.4M in contracts
    100%
  4. 4
    Ministry of Defense$863.5M of $863.5M in contracts
    100%
  5. 5
    MSM Group North America Inc.$635.2M of $635.2M in contracts
    100%
  6. 6
    Aevex Aerospace, LLC$676.1M of $676.9M in contracts
    100%
  7. 7
    The Aerospace Corporation$1.4B of $1.4B in contracts
    100%
  8. 8
    Bell Boeing Joint Project Office$1.3B of $1.4B in contracts
    99%
  9. 998%
  10. 10
    California Institute of Technology$2.3B of $2.4B in contracts
    98%
See the full ranking →

Top federal contractors

≈ computed · contract dollars

The biggest holders of federal contracts this year, ranked by contract-coded obligations (so entitlement grants to state agencies don't crowd out the primes).

  1. 1$75B
  2. 2$34.7B
  3. 3
    RTX Corporation50 industries
    $30.5B
  4. 4
    UnitedHealth Group7 industries
    $25.3B
  5. 5
    The Boeing Company38 industries
    $21.9B
  6. 6$13.4B
  7. 7$12.8B
  8. 8$11.9B
  9. 9$10.4B
  10. 10
    Leidos, Inc.36 industries
    $8.7B
See the full ranking →

Biggest contracts

≈ computed · total contract value

The largest individual contracts and contract vehicles by total value over their life (base plus all options): a multi-year vehicle can dwarf any one fiscal year's obligations.

  1. 1
    Contract HT940216C0001Humana Government Business Inc
    $51.3B
  2. 2
    Contract DEAC0494AL85000Lockheed Martin Corp
    $48.1B
  3. 3
    National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (Ntess)…National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC
    $43.2B
  4. 4$42.4B
  5. 5$41.5B
  6. 6
    M&o of Lanl BR of U of CAThe Regents of the University of California
    $35.3B
  7. 7$35.1B
  8. 8
    LRIP Lot 12 Advance Acquisition ContractLockheed Martin Corporation
    $35.1B
  9. 9$34.9B
  10. 10$34.7B
See the full ranking →

Where the money concentrates

≈ computed · by state

States ranked by the total value of federal work performed there. Place of performance is reliably reported at the state level; congressional-district figures are inferred and live on their own pages.

  1. 1$485.7B
  2. 2$325B
  3. 3$311.5B
  4. 4$281.6B
  5. 5$262.2B
  6. 6$242.1B
  7. 7$214.2B
  8. 8$207.1B
  9. 9$173.4B
  10. 10$153.6B
See the full ranking →

Contractors giving the most through their PAC

≈ computed · PAC money to Congress

Federal contractors ranked by how much their political action committee gave to members of Congress, from FEC records. A contribution is a public, disclosed fact placed beside the contracts: context, not a claim of influence.

  1. 1
    Honeywell International Inc.to 398 members of Congress
    $6.1M
  2. 2
    Lockheed Martin Corporationto 414 members of Congress
    $4.9M
  3. 3
    United Parcel Service Co.to 391 members of Congress
    $4.8M
  4. 4
    The Boeing Companyto 375 members of Congress
    $4.8M
  5. 5
    Raytheon Companyto 338 members of Congress
    $4.3M
  6. 6
    General Dynamics Corporationto 342 members of Congress
    $4.1M
  7. 7
    General Motors LLCto 328 members of Congress
    $3M
  8. 8
    UnitedHealth Groupto 268 members of Congress
    $2.7M
  9. 9
    L3Harris Technologies, Inc.to 228 members of Congress
    $2.6M
  10. 10
    Space Exploration Technologies Corp.to 258 members of Congress
    $2.6M
See the full ranking →

Largest single awards of FY2025

✓ from source · one award each

The biggest INDIVIDUAL contracts and grants whose latest action falls in FY2025, by obligated value. One award per row, not a company's yearly total.

  1. 1
    Medicaid Entitlement for 7 - Fy 2026 - T19Health Care Services, California Department of
    $100.1B
  2. 2$56.8B
  3. 3$31.6B
  4. 4
    Medicaid Entitlement for 46 - Fy 2026 - T19PA Department of Human Services
    $29B
  5. 5$26.1B
  6. 6
    Medicaid Entitlement for 35 - Fy 2026 - T19North Carolina Department of Health & Human Services
    $24.8B
  7. 7
    Medicaid Entitlement for 14 - Fy 2026 - T19Florida Agency for Health Care Administration
    $21.9B
  8. 8
    Medicaid Entitlement for 20 - Fy 2026 - T19Illinois Department of Healthcare & Family Services
    $20.3B
  9. 9
    Medicaid Entitlement for 30 - Fy 2026 - T19Michigan Department of Health and Human Services
    $18.8B
  10. 10
    Medicaid Entitlement for 6 - Fy 2026 - T19Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System
    $15.8B
See the full ranking →

Most geographically concentrated agencies

≈ computed · share in one state

The share of an agency's award dollars on record here that land in a single state. Computed from the individual award records we hold, pairing each award's awarding agency with its own reported place of performance.

  1. 1
    Department of State$805.8M of $1.3B in DC
    61%
  2. 2
    Department of Veterans Affairs$30.4B of $53.3B in VA
    57%
  3. 339%
  4. 4
    Department of the Interior$785.1M of $2.4B in CA
    32%
  5. 529%
  6. 628%
  7. 7
    Department of Labor$1.2B of $4.6B in CA
    27%
  8. 8
    Department of Justice$359.8M of $1.3B in VA
    27%
  9. 9
    Department of Transportation$6.4B of $28.8B in MD
    22%
  10. 10
    General Services Administration$640.6M of $3.3B in AL
    19%
See the full ranking →

Agencies by grant vs contract mix

≈ computed · assistance share

How lopsided each agency is between buying things and funding them: assistance dollars against contract dollars, most grant-heavy first.

  1. 1
    Social Security Administration$1.6T assistance vs $1.4B contracts
    100% grants
  2. 2
    Railroad Retirement Board$14.5B assistance vs $40.4M contracts
    100% grants
  3. 3
    Department of Housing and Urban Development$81.4B assistance vs $603.5M contracts
    99% grants
  4. 4
    Department of Health and Human Services$1.9T assistance vs $20.8B contracts
    99% grants
  5. 5
    Federal Communications Commission$6.7B assistance vs $111.2M contracts
    98% grants
  6. 6
    Department of Education$85.1B assistance vs $2.5B contracts
    97% grants
  7. 7
    Department of Agriculture$159B assistance vs $5.4B contracts
    97% grants
  8. 8
    Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation$6.3B assistance vs $268.6M contracts
    96% grants
  9. 9
    Department of Transportation$116.4B assistance vs $6B contracts
    95% grants
  10. 10
    Environmental Protection Agency$23.1B assistance vs $1.5B contracts
    94% grants
See the full ranking →

Congressional committees ranked by the obligations of the agencies within their jurisdiction. Oversight is a formal responsibility, not control of any particular award.

  1. 1
    House Committee on Appropriations10 agencies in jurisdiction
    $3.3T
  2. 2
    Senate Committee on Appropriations10 agencies in jurisdiction
    $3.3T
  3. 3
    House Committee on Energy and Commerce2 agencies in jurisdiction
    $2.1T
  4. 4
    House Committee on Ways and Means1 agency in jurisdiction
    $2T
  5. 5
    Senate Committee on Finance1 agency in jurisdiction
    $2T
  6. 6$2T
  7. 7
    House Committee on Armed Services1 agency in jurisdiction
    $501.6B
  8. 8
    Senate Committee on Armed Services1 agency in jurisdiction
    $501.6B
  9. 9
    House Committee on Veterans' Affairs1 agency in jurisdiction
    $288B
  10. 10$288B
See the full ranking →
🔎
Why the labels? The graph is only worth anything if the links are trusted. Facts taken straight from a federal filing are ✓ from source; figures we calculate are ≈ computed; links we infer (corporate parents, districts, competitors, connections between records) are ≈ inferred, worded carefully, never asserted as fact and never a claim that one thing caused another. Spot an error? Tell us.