Contractors / Dell Technologies Inc.
Dell Technologies Inc.
combines 2 subsidiaries and business units ≈ inferred
$3.3B
obligated · FY2025
13
funding agencies
62%
from Defense
2%
single-source
15
states
44%
in Texas
12
industries
≈ computedSingle-source: 2% of this recipient’s $3.3B in federal contracts was awarded without competition (FPDS extent-competed codes); the rest was competed or unclassified. A high share often reflects sole-source or specialized work, not wrongdoing.
Obligations by year
≈ computed$3.1B
FY23
$3.4B
FY24
$3.3B
FY25
▲ 8%
since FY23
Where this money comes from
✓ from sourceFUNDING AGENCIES
DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Defense
$2.1B
Veterans Affairs
$0.6B
Homeland Security
$0.2B
HHS
$0.2B
9 other agencies
$0.3B
Dell Technologies Inc.
$3.3B
FY2025 obligated
Biggest awards (total value)
awarded 2017$1.7B
awarded 2022$1.6B
awarded 2022$1.3B
awarded 2025$1B
awarded 2024$508M
awarded 2023$477.2M
awarded 2022$354.9M
awarded 2025$272.2M
Total value over each award’s life, for awards active in FY2025: a decades-long contract can exceed one year’s obligations above.
What it does (NAICS / PSC)
Software Publishers$110.5M
Where the work lands
Texas✓ from source$1.4B
District Of Columbia✓ from source$745.9M
Alabama✓ from source$517.9M
Virginia✓ from source$243.5M
Maryland✓ from source$163.8M
Washington✓ from source$79.2M
Utah✓ from source$33.9M
California✓ from source$11.7M
Competitors
No competitors computed.
Subsidiaries & business units
Subsidiaries and business units grouped under Dell Technologies Inc. by corporate ownership. ≈ inferred Source: Dell Technologies corporate structure.
Political contributions
Dell Technologies, Inc. Political Action Committeegave$862.6Kto members of Congress, 2024 cycle✓ from source
linked through public filings, not a claim of coordination. contribution reported to the FEC, a public campaign-finance record.
🔎
Why the labels? The graph is only worth anything if the links are trusted. Facts taken straight from a federal filing are ✓ from source; anything we compute or infer (corporate parents, districts, competitors) is ≈ inferred and worded carefully, never asserted as fact.