Contractors / Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
prime recipient of federal awards · UEI C6M7C2FLKER5 ✓ from source
$3.8B
obligated · FY2025
10
funding agencies
57%
from National Aeron…
2%
single-source
10
states
55%
in California
9
industries
≈ computedSingle-source: 2% of this recipient’s $3B in federal contracts was awarded without competition (FPDS extent-competed codes); the rest was competed or unclassified. A high share often reflects sole-source or specialized work, not wrongdoing.
Obligations by year
≈ computed$1.2B
FY20
$2.2B
FY21
$2.8B
FY22
$3.1B
FY23
$3.8B
FY24
$3.8B
FY25
▲ 219%
since FY20
Where this money comes from
✓ from sourceFUNDING AGENCIES
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNO
NASA
$2.1B
Defense
$1.6B
8 other agencies
$0B
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
$3.8B
FY2025 obligated
Biggest awards (total value)
awarded 2020$3.2B
awarded 2016$3B
awarded 2024$540.7M
awarded 2024$425.6M
awarded 2019$313.8M
awarded 2016$214M
Total value over each award’s life, for awards active in FY2025: a decades-long contract can exceed one year’s obligations above.
What it does (NAICS / PSC)
Where the work lands
Competitors
United Launch Services, LLC≈ computed$620M
Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation≈ computed$529.2M
Kalitta Air LLC≈ computed$208.5M
Air Transport International Inc≈ computed$153.5M
Blue Origin Washington, LLC≈ computed$50.6M
Canadian Commercial Corporation≈ computed$19.9M
United Parcel Service Co.≈ computed$7.3M
Lockheed Martin Corporation≈ computed$600K
computed from shared NAICS, not a stated rivalry.
Corporate family
Single registration: no combined family.
Political contributions
Space Exploration Technologies Corp. PAC≈ inferredgave$2.6Mto members of Congress✓ from source
linked through public filings, not a claim of coordination. contribution reported to the FEC, a public campaign-finance record.
🔎
Why the labels? The graph is only worth anything if the links are trusted. Facts taken straight from a federal filing are ✓ from source; figures we calculate are ≈ computed; links we infer (corporate parents, districts, competitors, connections between records) are ≈ inferred, worded carefully, never asserted as fact and never a claim that one thing caused another. Spot an error? Tell us.