TheFiscalFinder
Contractors / BAE Systems, Inc.

BAE Systems, Inc.

combines 19 subsidiaries and business units ≈ inferred · Subsidiary of BAE Systems plc · United Kingdom ≈ inferred
$8B
obligated · FY2025
11
funding agencies
96%
from Defense
54%
single-source
23
states
35%
in Pennsylvania
44
industries

≈ computedSingle-source: 54% of this recipient’s $7.9B in federal contracts was awarded without competition (FPDS extent-competed codes); the rest was competed or unclassified. A high share often reflects sole-source or specialized work, not wrongdoing.

Obligations by year

≈ computed
$6.3B
FY20
$4.6B
FY21
$4.5B
FY22
$7.4B
FY23
$7.9B
FY24
$8B
FY25
26%
since FY20

Where this money comes from

✓ from source
FUNDING AGENCIES
BAE SYSTEMS, INC.
Defense
$7.7B
NASA
$0.1B
9 other agencies
$0.2B
BAE Systems, Inc.
$8B
FY2025 obligated
band width = obligations · FY2025 · source: USASpending.gov

Biggest awards (total value)

awarded 2015$3.7B
awarded 1999$2.3B
awarded 2014$2B
awarded 2006$1.6B
awarded 2001$1.3B

Total value over each award’s life, for awards active in FY2025: a decades-long contract can exceed one year’s obligations above.

Where the work lands

Pennsylvania✓ from source$2.8B
New Hampshire✓ from source$1.1B
Maryland✓ from source$836.9M
California✓ from source$668.2M
Virginia✓ from source$359.8M
Florida✓ from source$283.7M
Tennessee✓ from source$264.3M
District Of Columbia✓ from source$219.2M

Competitors

Am General LLC≈ computed$485M
Honeywell International Inc.≈ computed$460.4M
Textron Systems Corp≈ computed$163.4M
Loc Performance Products LLC≈ computed$141.8M

computed from shared NAICS, not a stated rivalry.

Subsidiaries & business units

Political contributions

BAE Systems Inc. Political Action Committee (BAE Systems USA PAC)≈ inferredgave$2.1Mto members of Congress✓ from source

linked through public filings, not a claim of coordination. contribution reported to the FEC, a public campaign-finance record.

🔎
Why the labels? The graph is only worth anything if the links are trusted. Facts taken straight from a federal filing are ✓ from source; figures we calculate are ≈ computed; links we infer (corporate parents, districts, competitors, connections between records) are ≈ inferred, worded carefully, never asserted as fact and never a claim that one thing caused another. Spot an error? Tell us.