Contractor profile
BAE Systems GCS International Limited
FY2026 ended Sep 30 · data still posting · data as of 2026-11-01†
† DoD contract data posts to USAspending about 90 days after award.
$117M
Obligated
FY2026 · data still posting
1
Funding agencies
100%
From Defense
1
States
100%
In Alabama
2
Industries
In FY2026, BAE Systems GCS International Limited received $117M in federal awards from the Department of Defense, with 100% of the work performed in Alabama. Across FY2022 to FY2026 its recorded total is $702.9M. FY2026 ended Sep 30 and its data is still posting. Computed
Where this money comes from
SourceFUNDING AGENCIES
BAE SYSTEMS GCS INTERNAT
Defense
$0.1B
BAE Systems GCS International Limited
$0.1B
FY2026 obligated
Where the work lands
SourceAlabama$116.8M
Key takeaways
Computed- BAE Systems GCS International Limited received $117M in federal obligations in FY2026 (data still posting), compared with $143.7M in FY2025.
- The Department of Defense accounted for 99% of it.
- Its largest recorded industry was Small Arms, Ordnance, and Ordnance Accessories Manufacturing, at $117M.
- Alabama was its largest place of performance, with 99% of the work.
Obligations by year
Computed$127.4M
FY22
$314.8M
FY24
$143.7M
FY25
$117M
FY26 partial
▲ 13%
FY22 to FY25
Awards
SourceLargest active awards by total value
Awards whose period of performance overlaps FY2026, by the amount obligated on each so far.
| Award | ID | Agency | Obligated | Start | End | Place |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M777A2 India FMS Case IN-B-Uak 145 Howitzers | W15QKN17C0011 | Department of Defense | $564.3M | 2017-01-12 | 2028-10-30 | — |
| Undefinitized Delivery Order for Large Structures | W15QKN24F0025 | Department of Defense | $162.2M | 2023-12-21 | 2027-11-30 | Alabama |
Largest FY2026 awards
Awards that started in FY2026, by the amount obligated on each so far.
No award on record started in FY2026.
What it does (NAICS / PSC)
Corporate family
One registration (UEI YULKFV81TEL3) of the combined recipient above.
Related
Why the labels? The graph is only worth anything if the links are trusted. Facts taken straight from a federal filing are Source; figures we calculate are Computed; links we infer (corporate parents, districts, similar contractors, connections between records) are Inferred, worded carefully, never asserted as fact and never a claim that one thing caused another. Spot an error? Tell us.