Where the money concentrates
≈ computed · by stateStates ranked by the total value of federal work performed there in FY2025. Place of performance is reliably reported at the state level; congressional-district figures are inferred from it and live on their own pages. Each row opens the state's page. ≈ computed
- 1$485.7B
- 2$325B
- 3$311.5B
- 4$281.6B
- 5$262.2B
- 6$242.1B
- 7$214.2B
- 8$207.1B
- 9$173.4B
- 10$153.6B
- 11$137.1B
- 12$134.7B
- 13$129.5B
- 14$129.1B
- 15$126.4B
- 16$121.4B
- 17$113B
- 18$112.1B
- 19$105.9B
- 20$105.7B
- 21$103.3B
- 22$98.4B
- 23$96.5B
- 24$93.8B
- 25$89.5B
- 26$71.6B
- 27$70.2B
- 28$59.8B
- 29$57.2B
- 30$50.3B
- 31$48.9B
- 32$41.5B
- 33$38.6B
- 34$38.4B
- 35$36.5B
- 36$34.9B
- 37$34B
- 38$31B
- 39$29.1B
- 40$27.8B
- 41$23.8B
- 42$22.9B
- 43$22.7B
- 44$22B
- 45$18.5B
- 46$17B
- 47$15.4B
- 48$15.1B
- 49$12.2B
- 50$11.5B
- 51$10.7B
- 52$8.9B
- 53$7B
- 54$4.9B
- 55$586.2M
- 56$178.7M
FY2025 figures unless noted. This ranking is computed by us from USASpending source records and refreshed with each data load; it is a description of the money, never a judgment about any recipient.
🔎
Why the labels? The graph is only worth anything if the links are trusted. Facts taken straight from a federal filing are ✓ from source; figures we calculate are ≈ computed; links we infer (corporate parents, districts, competitors, connections between records) are ≈ inferred, worded carefully, never asserted as fact and never a claim that one thing caused another. Spot an error? Tell us.