TheFiscalFinder

Top federal contractors: FY2022

≈ computed · contract dollars

Lockheed Martin Corporation was the largest holder of U.S. federal contracts in FY2022, with $46.6B in contract-coded obligations. Ranked by contract-coded (NAICS) obligations, so entitlement grants routed through state agencies do not crowd out the primes. Combined corporate families count once. ≈ computed

Ranked from USASpending records, data current as of 2026-07-11. FY2020 to FY2025 are loaded.

  1. 1$46.6B
  2. 2$23.7B
  3. 3
    RTX Corporation51 industries
    $23.4B
  4. 4
    Pfizer Inc5 industries
    $18B
  5. 5
    The Boeing Company39 industries
    $15.5B
  6. 6
    UnitedHealth Group12 industries
    $15.4B
  7. 7$11.7B
  8. 8$11.3B
  9. 9$8.4B
  10. 10
    Leidos, Inc.39 industries
    $8.1B
  11. 11$7.7B
  12. 12$7.4B
  13. 13$6.1B
  14. 14$6.1B
  15. 15$5.9B
  16. 16$4.5B
  17. 17
    BAE Systems, Inc.38 industries
    $4.5B
  18. 18$4.3B
  19. 19$4B
  20. 20
    KBR, Inc.25 industries
    $3.9B
  21. 21$3.9B
  22. 22$3.8B
  23. 23$3.6B
  24. 24$3.5B
  25. 25$3.5B
  26. 26
    Deloitte LLP15 industries
    $3.1B
  27. 27$3.1B
  28. 28$3.1B
  29. 29$3B
  30. 30$2.8B
  31. 31$2.8B
  32. 32$2.8B
  33. 33$2.8B
  34. 34$2.7B
  35. 35$2.7B
  36. 36$2.6B
  37. 37$2.6B
  38. 38$2.5B
  39. 39
    Peraton Corp.16 industries
    $2.5B
  40. 40$2.5B
  41. 41
    UT-Battelle LLC2 industries
    $2.5B
  42. 42$2.4B
  43. 43$2.3B
  44. 44$2.2B
  45. 45
    V2X, Inc.18 industries
    $2.2B
  46. 46
    General Atomics17 industries
    $2.2B
  47. 47$2.1B
  48. 48$2B
  49. 49$2B
  50. 50$2B
  51. 51$2B
  52. 52$2B
  53. 53$1.9B
  54. 54$1.8B
  55. 55$1.8B
  56. 56$1.8B
  57. 57$1.7B
  58. 58$1.7B
  59. 59$1.7B
  60. 60$1.6B
  61. 61
    Oshkosh Defense LLC10 industries
    $1.6B
  62. 62$1.6B
  63. 63$1.6B
  64. 64$1.5B
  65. 65$1.4B
  66. 66$1.4B
  67. 67$1.4B
  68. 68$1.3B
  69. 69$1.2B
  70. 70
    Parsons Corporation17 industries
    $1.2B
  71. 71$1.2B
  72. 72$1.1B
  73. 73
    FedEx Corporation10 industries
    $1.1B
  74. 74$1.1B
  75. 75
    Cgi Federal Inc.10 industries
    $1.1B
  76. 76$1.1B
  77. 77
    V2X Aerospace LLC10 industries
    $1.1B
  78. 78
    V2X Systems LLC9 industries
    $1.1B
  79. 79$1.1B
  80. 80$1.1B
  81. 81$1.1B
  82. 82$1.1B
  83. 83
    Walgreen Co.4 industries
    $1B
  84. 84
    Austal USA, LLC10 industries
    $1B
  85. 85$990M
  86. 86$952.2M
  87. 87$950.8M
  88. 88$936.8M
  89. 89$926.1M
  90. 90$923.2M
  91. 91$873M
  92. 92$867.5M
  93. 93
    Patriot Team2 industries
    $854.9M
  94. 94$821.2M
  95. 95
    Serco Inc10 industries
    $809.9M
  96. 96$795.8M
  97. 97$793.8M
  98. 98$780.5M
  99. 99
    Mvm, Inc.5 industries
    $768.8M
  100. 100$764M

A description of the money, computed by us from USASpending records, never a judgment about any contractor. Each row opens that contractor's page: its funding agencies, where the work lands, and any PAC on record.

Questions

Who is the largest federal contractor in FY2022?
Lockheed Martin Corporation, with $46.6B in contract-coded obligations in FY2022, ahead of General Dynamics Corporation at $23.7B.
Why are big grant recipients missing from this list?
This ranks CONTRACT dollars only. Universities, states and health systems receive enormous federal ASSISTANCE, which is ranked separately at /rankings/top-grant-recipients so neither list crowds out the other.
Where does this ranking come from?
It is computed from USASpending.gov award records, which are U.S. government works and in the public domain. Each figure is the recipient's contract-coded obligations for FY2022. TheFiscalFinder does the ranking; the underlying figures are the government's own.
How many contractors are shown?
The top 100 for FY2022. Each row opens that contractor's own page, where the same money is broken out by year, by counterparty and by place.
Does a high position mean anything is wrong?
No. This is a description of where public money went in FY2022, computed from public records. It is not an allegation about anyone on it.

Related rankings

🔎
Why the labels? The graph is only worth anything if the links are trusted. Facts taken straight from a federal filing are ✓ from source; figures we calculate are ≈ computed; links we infer (corporate parents, districts, competitors, connections between records) are ≈ inferred, worded carefully, never asserted as fact and never a claim that one thing caused another. Spot an error? Tell us.