TheFiscalFinder

Top congressional districts by federal spending: FY2025

≈ inferred · place of performance

IN-07 saw more federal work than any other congressional district in FY2025: $143.7B. Ranked by federal work performed in each district. District attribution is INFERRED from the place of performance on each award, not reported directly. ≈ computed

Ranked from USASpending records, data current as of 2026-09-01. FY2020 to FY2025 are loaded.

  1. 1
    IN-0731 recipients
    $143.7B
  2. 2
    KY-0319 recipients
    $122.1B
  3. 3
    PA-1034 recipients
    $114.7B
  4. 4
    ND-0016 recipients
    $98.4B
  5. 5
    WI-0215 recipients
    $55.4B
  6. 6
    DC-9891 recipients
    $48.9B
  7. 7
    VA-0751 recipients
    $38B
  8. 8
    PR-9813 recipients
    $37.8B
  9. 9
    VA-1171 recipients
    $35.4B
  10. 10
    VA-0862 recipients
    $34.9B
  11. 11
    TX-1212 recipients
    $33.1B
  12. 12
    MO-0118 recipients
    $30.1B
  13. 13
    CT-027 recipients
    $25.1B
  14. 14
    TX-3315 recipients
    $22.6B
  15. 15
    AK-0021 recipients
    $18.5B
  16. 16
    AL-0543 recipients
    $17.9B
  17. 17
    FL-0235 recipients
    $17.6B
  18. 18
    TN-0319 recipients
    $16.3B
  19. 19
    FL-0830 recipients
    $15.3B
  20. 20
    VA-0336 recipients
    $15.2B
  21. 21
    VA-0228 recipients
    $14.2B
  22. 22
    AZ-0720 recipients
    $13.7B
  23. 23
    NM-0128 recipients
    $13.6B
  24. 24
    FL-1327 recipients
    $12.8B
  25. 25
    MA-0615 recipients
    $12.7B
  26. 26
    HI-0135 recipients
    $12.6B
  27. 27
    DE-0013 recipients
    $12.2B
  28. 28
    NM-0319 recipients
    $12B
  29. 29
    MD-0841 recipients
    $11.8B
  30. 30
    NY-2019 recipients
    $11.8B
  31. 31
    MS-0423 recipients
    $11.7B
  32. 32
    MD-0554 recipients
    $11.6B
  33. 33
    SD-008 recipients
    $11.5B
  34. 34
    MI-0717 recipients
    $10.9B
  35. 35
    VI-9813 recipients
    $10.7B
  36. 36
    CO-0732 recipients
    $10.6B
  37. 37
    FL-1027 recipients
    $10B
  38. 38
    MD-0325 recipients
    $10B
  39. 39
    NY-257 recipients
    $10B
  40. 40
    CT-0313 recipients
    $9.8B
  41. 41
    TX-3720 recipients
    $9.7B
  42. 42
    ME-0112 recipients
    $9.6B
  43. 43
    NE-029 recipients
    $9.5B
  44. 44
    WA-0411 recipients
    $9.5B
  45. 45
    OK-0426 recipients
    $9.5B
  46. 46
    MD-0444 recipients
    $9.4B
  47. 47
    CO-0541 recipients
    $9.2B
  48. 48
    NC-1124 recipients
    $9.1B
  49. 49
    FL-0140 recipients
    $9.1B
  50. 50
    CT-0112 recipients
    $8.9B
  51. 51
    VT-0018 recipients
    $8.9B
  52. 52
    OH-1031 recipients
    $8.7B
  53. 53
    GA-0539 recipients
    $8.6B
  54. 54
    WV-0224 recipients
    $8.5B
  55. 55
    NV-0214 recipients
    $8.5B
  56. 56
    WV-0114 recipients
    $8.4B
  57. 57
    AL-0222 recipients
    $8.4B
  58. 58
    FL-1717 recipients
    $8.4B
  59. 59
    SC-0638 recipients
    $8.3B
  60. 60
    AR-0215 recipients
    $8.3B
  61. 61
    MO-0528 recipients
    $8.2B
  62. 62
    ID-029 recipients
    $8B
  63. 63
    SC-0218 recipients
    $8B
  64. 64
    PA-049 recipients
    $8B
  65. 65
    OR-049 recipients
    $7.9B
  66. 66
    MD-0134 recipients
    $7.8B
  67. 67
    CA-3627 recipients
    $7.8B
  68. 68
    IA-028 recipients
    $7.8B
  69. 69
    NC-0425 recipients
    $7.8B
  70. 70
    VA-1043 recipients
    $7.7B
  71. 71
    TX-1310 recipients
    $7.7B
  72. 72
    NC-0325 recipients
    $7.6B
  73. 73
    MI-1027 recipients
    $7.6B
  74. 74
    FL-1915 recipients
    $7.6B
  75. 75
    MI-018 recipients
    $7.6B
  76. 76
    WI-066 recipients
    $7.5B
  77. 77
    TN-0115 recipients
    $7.5B
  78. 78
    MD-0736 recipients
    $7.5B
  79. 79
    CA-0718 recipients
    $7.5B
  80. 80
    CA-5034 recipients
    $7.4B
  81. 81
    NY-1012 recipients
    $7.4B
  82. 82
    SC-0710 recipients
    $7.4B
  83. 83
    WA-0716 recipients
    $7.3B
  84. 84
    WI-0311 recipients
    $7.3B
  85. 85
    PA-1215 recipients
    $7.3B
  86. 86
    MI-039 recipients
    $7.3B
  87. 87
    KY-0121 recipients
    $7.2B
  88. 88
    OK-029 recipients
    $7.2B
  89. 89
    FL-1819 recipients
    $7.2B
  90. 90
    NC-0221 recipients
    $7.1B
  91. 91
    MA-0531 recipients
    $7B
  92. 92
    WY-0013 recipients
    $7B
  93. 93
    GA-0126 recipients
    $6.9B
  94. 94
    PA-0816 recipients
    $6.9B
  95. 95
    KS-0217 recipients
    $6.9B
  96. 96
    CA-0617 recipients
    $6.9B
  97. 97
    TN-0716 recipients
    $6.9B
  98. 98
    GA-0227 recipients
    $6.9B
  99. 99
    IL-1713 recipients
    $6.8B
  100. 100
    KY-0623 recipients
    $6.8B

The source's own congressional-district field is frequently missing or wrong, so these figures are derived and labeled inferred throughout the site. State-level figures are reliable; district-level ones are our best reading of the same records.

Questions

Which congressional district receives the most federal spending in FY2025?
IN-07, with $143.7B of federal work performed there in FY2025. District figures are inferred from place of performance.
Why are district figures inferred rather than reported?
Because the congressional-district field on federal award records is frequently blank or stale. We derive the district from the reported place of performance instead, and say so on every page that shows one.
Where does this ranking come from?
It is computed from USASpending.gov award records, which are U.S. government works and in the public domain. Each figure is the federal work performed in that district in FY2025, inferred from place of performance. TheFiscalFinder does the ranking; the underlying figures are the government's own.
How many districts are shown?
The top 100 for FY2025. Each row opens that district's own page, where the same money is broken out by year, by counterparty and by place.
Does a high position mean anything is wrong?
No. This is a description of where public money went in FY2025, computed from public records. It is not an allegation about anyone on it.

Related rankings

Top states by federal spending receivedTop contractors of the Department of StateTop federal sub-agencies by spendingTop federal assistance programs
← All rankingsLeaderboards →
🔎
Why the labels? The graph is only worth anything if the links are trusted. Facts taken straight from a federal filing are ✓ from source; figures we calculate are ≈ computed; links we infer (corporate parents, districts, competitors, connections between records) are ≈ inferred, worded carefully, never asserted as fact and never a claim that one thing caused another. Spot an error? Tell us.