TheFiscalFinder

Top congressional districts by federal spending: FY2022

≈ inferred · place of performance

IN-07 saw more federal work than any other congressional district in FY2022: $111B. Ranked by federal work performed in each district. District attribution is INFERRED from the place of performance on each award, not reported directly. ≈ computed

Ranked from USASpending records, data current as of 2026-07-11. FY2020 to FY2025 are loaded.

  1. 1
    IN-0726 recipients
    $111B
  2. 2
    KY-0312 recipients
    $107.5B
  3. 3
    PA-1032 recipients
    $86.2B
  4. 4
    ND-0015 recipients
    $70.9B
  5. 5
    DC-9889 recipients
    $51.3B
  6. 6
    WI-0213 recipients
    $44.6B
  7. 7
    PR-9821 recipients
    $38.6B
  8. 8
    VA-1165 recipients
    $29.1B
  9. 9
    NY-2023 recipients
    $28.1B
  10. 10
    VA-0860 recipients
    $23.1B
  11. 11
    VA-0736 recipients
    $22.2B
  12. 12
    NY-1214 recipients
    $19.5B
  13. 13
    TX-1218 recipients
    $18.8B
  14. 14
    MO-0119 recipients
    $18.5B
  15. 15
    TX-3313 recipients
    $18.4B
  16. 16
    MD-0846 recipients
    $15.3B
  17. 17
    AK-0023 recipients
    $14.9B
  18. 18
    FL-0230 recipients
    $14.5B
  19. 19
    TN-0314 recipients
    $14.5B
  20. 20
    AL-0539 recipients
    $13.4B
  21. 21
    VA-0335 recipients
    $13.1B
  22. 22
    FL-0831 recipients
    $12.8B
  23. 23
    NM-0116 recipients
    $11.1B
  24. 24
    SD-0012 recipients
    $10.9B
  25. 25
    CA-0722 recipients
    $10.9B
  26. 26
    DE-0014 recipients
    $10.3B
  27. 27
    CT-0210 recipients
    $10B
  28. 28
    AZ-0721 recipients
    $10B
  29. 29
    NM-0315 recipients
    $9.9B
  30. 30
    CT-0114 recipients
    $9.8B
  31. 31
    VA-0229 recipients
    $9.5B
  32. 32
    HI-0131 recipients
    $9.4B
  33. 33
    MI-1022 recipients
    $9B
  34. 34
    MA-0620 recipients
    $9B
  35. 35
    TX-3720 recipients
    $9B
  36. 36
    MD-0548 recipients
    $9B
  37. 37
    CO-0729 recipients
    $8.9B
  38. 38
    MD-0440 recipients
    $8.8B
  39. 39
    NY-257 recipients
    $8.3B
  40. 40
    MI-0715 recipients
    $8.1B
  41. 41
    MD-0327 recipients
    $8B
  42. 42
    MD-0739 recipients
    $8B
  43. 43
    MS-0421 recipients
    $7.8B
  44. 44
    FL-1316 recipients
    $7.7B
  45. 45
    NE-0211 recipients
    $7.7B
  46. 46
    VT-0016 recipients
    $7.6B
  47. 47
    WV-0111 recipients
    $7.6B
  48. 48
    WA-0412 recipients
    $7.5B
  49. 49
    WV-0230 recipients
    $7.3B
  50. 50
    OK-0427 recipients
    $7.3B
  51. 51
    ME-0115 recipients
    $7.3B
  52. 52
    NC-0423 recipients
    $7.3B
  53. 53
    MI-018 recipients
    $7.3B
  54. 54
    PA-1215 recipients
    $7.2B
  55. 55
    KS-0222 recipients
    $7.2B
  56. 56
    CO-0526 recipients
    $7.2B
  57. 57
    OH-1027 recipients
    $7.1B
  58. 58
    KY-0120 recipients
    $7.1B
  59. 59
    NJ-0317 recipients
    $7.1B
  60. 60
    LA-0615 recipients
    $7.1B
  61. 61
    MO-0527 recipients
    $7.1B
  62. 62
    CA-039 recipients
    $6.9B
  63. 63
    SC-0220 recipients
    $6.8B
  64. 64
    FL-0135 recipients
    $6.8B
  65. 65
    NV-0212 recipients
    $6.7B
  66. 66
    IA-029 recipients
    $6.7B
  67. 67
    OH-132 recipients
    $6.6B
  68. 68
    UT-0132 recipients
    $6.6B
  69. 69
    VA-1025 recipients
    $6.6B
  70. 70
    OR-046 recipients
    $6.6B
  71. 71
    AR-0216 recipients
    $6.6B
  72. 72
    WI-067 recipients
    $6.6B
  73. 73
    WA-0715 recipients
    $6.5B
  74. 74
    NC-0322 recipients
    $6.5B
  75. 75
    TX-1614 recipients
    $6.5B
  76. 76
    PA-1324 recipients
    $6.4B
  77. 77
    FL-1017 recipients
    $6.4B
  78. 78
    MD-0134 recipients
    $6.4B
  79. 79
    TX-1313 recipients
    $6.4B
  80. 80
    MA-0726 recipients
    $6.3B
  81. 81
    ID-028 recipients
    $6.3B
  82. 82
    TN-0917 recipients
    $6.2B
  83. 83
    WY-0012 recipients
    $6.2B
  84. 84
    CA-5042 recipients
    $6.2B
  85. 85
    MO-0314 recipients
    $6.1B
  86. 86
    MS-0314 recipients
    $6.1B
  87. 87
    OK-0211 recipients
    $6B
  88. 88
    MI-038 recipients
    $5.9B
  89. 89
    FL-189 recipients
    $5.9B
  90. 90
    NY-1017 recipients
    $5.8B
  91. 91
    SC-074 recipients
    $5.8B
  92. 92
    IL-1230 recipients
    $5.8B
  93. 93
    MD-0628 recipients
    $5.8B
  94. 94
    TN-0716 recipients
    $5.7B
  95. 95
    NC-1110 recipients
    $5.7B
  96. 96
    PA-0814 recipients
    $5.7B
  97. 97
    TN-0112 recipients
    $5.7B
  98. 98
    FL-175 recipients
    $5.7B
  99. 99
    GA-1218 recipients
    $5.7B
  100. 100
    VA-0422 recipients
    $5.6B

The source's own congressional-district field is frequently missing or wrong, so these figures are derived and labeled inferred throughout the site. State-level figures are reliable; district-level ones are our best reading of the same records.

Questions

Which congressional district receives the most federal spending in FY2022?
IN-07, with $111B of federal work performed there in FY2022. District figures are inferred from place of performance.
Why are district figures inferred rather than reported?
Because the congressional-district field on federal award records is frequently blank or stale. We derive the district from the reported place of performance instead, and say so on every page that shows one.
Where does this ranking come from?
It is computed from USASpending.gov award records, which are U.S. government works and in the public domain. Each figure is the federal work performed in that district in FY2022, inferred from place of performance. TheFiscalFinder does the ranking; the underlying figures are the government's own.
How many districts are shown?
The top 100 for FY2022. Each row opens that district's own page, where the same money is broken out by year, by counterparty and by place.
Does a high position mean anything is wrong?
No. This is a description of where public money went in FY2022, computed from public records. It is not an allegation about anyone on it.

Related rankings

Top states by federal spending receivedTop contractors of the Department of StateTop federal sub-agencies by spendingTop federal assistance programs
← All rankingsLeaderboards →
🔎
Why the labels? The graph is only worth anything if the links are trusted. Facts taken straight from a federal filing are ✓ from source; figures we calculate are ≈ computed; links we infer (corporate parents, districts, competitors, connections between records) are ≈ inferred, worded carefully, never asserted as fact and never a claim that one thing caused another. Spot an error? Tell us.