TheFiscalFinder

Top congressional districts by federal spending: FY2023

≈ inferred · place of performance

IN-07 saw more federal work than any other congressional district in FY2023: $127.5B. Ranked by federal work performed in each district. District attribution is INFERRED from the place of performance on each award, not reported directly. ≈ computed

Ranked from USASpending records, data current as of 2026-07-03. FY2020 to FY2025 are loaded.

  1. 1
    IN-070 recipients
    $127.5B
  2. 2
    KY-030 recipients
    $112.9B
  3. 3
    PA-100 recipients
    $102.9B
  4. 4
    ND-000 recipients
    $82B
  5. 5
    DC-980 recipients
    $52.3B
  6. 6
    WI-020 recipients
    $51.5B
  7. 7
    PR-980 recipients
    $39.3B
  8. 8
    TX-120 recipients
    $33.7B
  9. 9
    VA-110 recipients
    $32.6B
  10. 10
    VA-070 recipients
    $30.2B
  11. 11
    VA-080 recipients
    $26.6B
  12. 12
    MO-010 recipients
    $24.9B
  13. 13
    NY-200 recipients
    $23.2B
  14. 14
    TX-330 recipients
    $19.2B
  15. 15
    AK-000 recipients
    $16.2B
  16. 16
    TN-030 recipients
    $15.4B
  17. 17
    AL-050 recipients
    $15.1B
  18. 18
    VA-030 recipients
    $14B
  19. 19
    FL-020 recipients
    $13.6B
  20. 20
    FL-080 recipients
    $13.6B
  21. 21
    NM-010 recipients
    $12B
  22. 22
    MS-040 recipients
    $11.9B
  23. 23
    MD-080 recipients
    $11.8B
  24. 24
    MA-060 recipients
    $11.7B
  25. 25
    CT-020 recipients
    $11.6B
  26. 26
    VA-020 recipients
    $11.5B
  27. 27
    AZ-070 recipients
    $11.5B
  28. 28
    DE-000 recipients
    $11.1B
  29. 29
    NM-030 recipients
    $10.4B
  30. 30
    HI-010 recipients
    $10.4B
  31. 31
    CT-010 recipients
    $10.4B
  32. 32
    MD-050 recipients
    $10.2B
  33. 33
    SD-000 recipients
    $9.9B
  34. 34
    MD-040 recipients
    $9.8B
  35. 35
    CO-070 recipients
    $9.8B
  36. 36
    FL-190 recipients
    $9.8B
  37. 37
    MD-030 recipients
    $8.9B
  38. 38
    NY-250 recipients
    $8.7B
  39. 39
    FL-130 recipients
    $8.6B
  40. 40
    ME-010 recipients
    $8.5B
  41. 41
    MI-100 recipients
    $8.4B
  42. 42
    LA-060 recipients
    $8.2B
  43. 43
    WA-040 recipients
    $8B
  44. 44
    VT-000 recipients
    $8B
  45. 45
    WV-010 recipients
    $8B
  46. 46
    NE-020 recipients
    $7.9B
  47. 47
    OH-100 recipients
    $7.9B
  48. 48
    CO-050 recipients
    $7.8B
  49. 49
    UT-010 recipients
    $7.7B
  50. 50
    SC-020 recipients
    $7.7B
  51. 51
    MD-070 recipients
    $7.7B
  52. 52
    OK-040 recipients
    $7.7B
  53. 53
    WV-020 recipients
    $7.6B
  54. 54
    FL-010 recipients
    $7.6B
  55. 55
    MO-050 recipients
    $7.4B
  56. 56
    KY-010 recipients
    $7.4B
  57. 57
    NV-020 recipients
    $7.4B
  58. 58
    CA-030 recipients
    $7.3B
  59. 59
    VA-100 recipients
    $7.3B
  60. 60
    CA-360 recipients
    $7.2B
  61. 61
    WI-060 recipients
    $7.1B
  62. 62
    OR-040 recipients
    $7.1B
  63. 63
    MD-010 recipients
    $7.1B
  64. 64
    NC-030 recipients
    $7B
  65. 65
    ID-020 recipients
    $7B
  66. 66
    MI-010 recipients
    $7B
  67. 67
    MI-070 recipients
    $6.9B
  68. 68
    CA-070 recipients
    $6.9B
  69. 69
    NY-100 recipients
    $6.9B
  70. 70
    IA-020 recipients
    $6.8B
  71. 71
    MD-060 recipients
    $6.8B
  72. 72
    FL-100 recipients
    $6.7B
  73. 73
    PA-080 recipients
    $6.7B
  74. 74
    CA-500 recipients
    $6.6B
  75. 75
    AR-020 recipients
    $6.6B
  76. 76
    FL-170 recipients
    $6.5B
  77. 77
    NJ-030 recipients
    $6.4B
  78. 78
    AL-020 recipients
    $6.4B
  79. 79
    FL-180 recipients
    $6.4B
  80. 80
    PA-120 recipients
    $6.4B
  81. 81
    MA-050 recipients
    $6.4B
  82. 82
    CT-030 recipients
    $6.3B
  83. 83
    MI-030 recipients
    $6.3B
  84. 84
    TN-010 recipients
    $6.3B
  85. 85
    KS-020 recipients
    $6.3B
  86. 86
    NC-040 recipients
    $6.3B
  87. 87
    NY-220 recipients
    $6.2B
  88. 88
    PA-130 recipients
    $6.2B
  89. 89
    SC-070 recipients
    $6.2B
  90. 90
    OK-020 recipients
    $6.1B
  91. 91
    TN-070 recipients
    $6.1B
  92. 92
    GA-020 recipients
    $6B
  93. 93
    WY-000 recipients
    $6B
  94. 94
    TX-160 recipients
    $6B
  95. 95
    GA-010 recipients
    $6B
  96. 96
    VA-090 recipients
    $6B
  97. 97
    WA-070 recipients
    $5.9B
  98. 98
    TX-370 recipients
    $5.9B
  99. 99
    IA-030 recipients
    $5.8B
  100. 100
    GA-120 recipients
    $5.8B

The source's own congressional-district field is frequently missing or wrong, so these figures are derived and labeled inferred throughout the site. State-level figures are reliable; district-level ones are our best reading of the same records.

Questions

Which congressional district receives the most federal spending in FY2023?
IN-07, with $127.5B of federal work performed there in FY2023. District figures are inferred from place of performance.
Why are district figures inferred rather than reported?
Because the congressional-district field on federal award records is frequently blank or stale. We derive the district from the reported place of performance instead, and say so on every page that shows one.
Where does this ranking come from?
It is computed from USASpending.gov award records, which are U.S. government works and in the public domain. Each figure is the federal work performed in that district in FY2023, inferred from place of performance. TheFiscalFinder does the ranking; the underlying figures are the government's own.
How many districts are shown?
The top 100 for FY2023. Each row opens that district's own page, where the same money is broken out by year, by counterparty and by place.
Does a high position mean anything is wrong?
No. This is a description of where public money went in FY2023, computed from public records. It is not an allegation about anyone on it.

Related rankings

Top states by federal spending receivedTop contractors of the Department of StateTop federal sub-agencies by spendingTop federal assistance programs
← All rankingsLeaderboards →
🔎
Why the labels? The graph is only worth anything if the links are trusted. Facts taken straight from a federal filing are ✓ from source; figures we calculate are ≈ computed; links we infer (corporate parents, districts, competitors, connections between records) are ≈ inferred, worded carefully, never asserted as fact and never a claim that one thing caused another. Spot an error? Tell us.