TheFiscalFinder

Top congressional districts by federal spending: FY2020

≈ inferred · place of performance

IN-07 saw more federal work than any other congressional district in FY2020: $129.7B. Ranked by federal work performed in each district. District attribution is INFERRED from the place of performance on each award, not reported directly. ≈ computed

Ranked from USASpending records, data current as of 2026-07-12. FY2020 to FY2025 are loaded.

  1. 1
    IN-0718 recipients
    $129.7B
  2. 2
    PA-1021 recipients
    $127B
  3. 3
    ND-0015 recipients
    $91.5B
  4. 4
    KY-0310 recipients
    $81.9B
  5. 5
    WI-0213 recipients
    $68.9B
  6. 6
    PR-9821 recipients
    $48.9B
  7. 7
    DC-9884 recipients
    $43.5B
  8. 8
    TX-1217 recipients
    $42.5B
  9. 9
    VA-1162 recipients
    $25.7B
  10. 10
    NY-2021 recipients
    $22.5B
  11. 11
    VA-0853 recipients
    $20.3B
  12. 12
    MO-0114 recipients
    $19.5B
  13. 13
    CA-0719 recipients
    $17.5B
  14. 14
    AK-0021 recipients
    $16.7B
  15. 15
    AL-0537 recipients
    $14.4B
  16. 16
    FL-0226 recipients
    $14.1B
  17. 17
    TN-038 recipients
    $14.1B
  18. 18
    VA-0336 recipients
    $13.4B
  19. 19
    SD-0011 recipients
    $13.1B
  20. 20
    TX-3721 recipients
    $12.9B
  21. 21
    CT-0212 recipients
    $12.3B
  22. 22
    NM-0125 recipients
    $12.2B
  23. 23
    TX-3317 recipients
    $12.2B
  24. 24
    DE-0014 recipients
    $12B
  25. 25
    AZ-0721 recipients
    $11.9B
  26. 26
    MD-0447 recipients
    $11.7B
  27. 27
    VA-0224 recipients
    $11.5B
  28. 28
    FL-0832 recipients
    $11.3B
  29. 29
    MD-0738 recipients
    $10.9B
  30. 30
    HI-0128 recipients
    $10.8B
  31. 31
    MA-0616 recipients
    $10.6B
  32. 32
    MD-0846 recipients
    $10.4B
  33. 33
    MS-0417 recipients
    $9.8B
  34. 34
    FL-1310 recipients
    $9.6B
  35. 35
    MI-0714 recipients
    $9.4B
  36. 36
    VT-0011 recipients
    $9.3B
  37. 37
    AZ-0812 recipients
    $9.2B
  38. 38
    NY-256 recipients
    $9.1B
  39. 39
    WV-0112 recipients
    $8.8B
  40. 40
    MD-0135 recipients
    $8.8B
  41. 41
    MD-0540 recipients
    $8.8B
  42. 42
    NM-0313 recipients
    $8.7B
  43. 43
    WA-0411 recipients
    $8.6B
  44. 44
    MI-1013 recipients
    $8.6B
  45. 45
    NC-0325 recipients
    $8.4B
  46. 46
    GA-0538 recipients
    $8.1B
  47. 47
    WI-066 recipients
    $8.1B
  48. 48
    NE-027 recipients
    $8.1B
  49. 49
    OH-1021 recipients
    $8.1B
  50. 50
    ME-0113 recipients
    $8B
  51. 51
    CA-1121 recipients
    $7.9B
  52. 52
    CT-0110 recipients
    $7.9B
  53. 53
    WY-0011 recipients
    $7.8B
  54. 54
    VA-1028 recipients
    $7.8B
  55. 55
    MA-0516 recipients
    $7.7B
  56. 56
    AR-0214 recipients
    $7.7B
  57. 57
    CO-0528 recipients
    $7.7B
  58. 58
    IA-028 recipients
    $7.7B
  59. 59
    NV-0213 recipients
    $7.6B
  60. 60
    WV-0226 recipients
    $7.5B
  61. 61
    MO-0526 recipients
    $7.5B
  62. 62
    CO-0718 recipients
    $7.5B
  63. 63
    MA-0720 recipients
    $7.4B
  64. 64
    CO-0116 recipients
    $7.4B
  65. 65
    TN-0914 recipients
    $7.4B
  66. 66
    CA-5037 recipients
    $7.3B
  67. 67
    CO-0620 recipients
    $7.2B
  68. 68
    MD-0325 recipients
    $7.2B
  69. 69
    CA-036 recipients
    $7.2B
  70. 70
    MD-0626 recipients
    $7.2B
  71. 71
    MI-039 recipients
    $7.1B
  72. 72
    IA-0311 recipients
    $7.1B
  73. 73
    MD-0230 recipients
    $7.1B
  74. 74
    OR-044 recipients
    $7.1B
  75. 75
    OK-0420 recipients
    $7.1B
  76. 76
    KY-0114 recipients
    $7B
  77. 77
    FL-0134 recipients
    $7B
  78. 78
    ID-029 recipients
    $6.9B
  79. 79
    WI-048 recipients
    $6.9B
  80. 80
    WA-0717 recipients
    $6.8B
  81. 81
    MI-016 recipients
    $6.8B
  82. 82
    NC-0424 recipients
    $6.8B
  83. 83
    TN-0713 recipients
    $6.8B
  84. 84
    IL-1011 recipients
    $6.6B
  85. 85
    GA-118 recipients
    $6.6B
  86. 86
    KS-0216 recipients
    $6.6B
  87. 87
    VA-0419 recipients
    $6.5B
  88. 88
    PA-065 recipients
    $6.5B
  89. 89
    IA-047 recipients
    $6.4B
  90. 90
    PA-1218 recipients
    $6.4B
  91. 91
    TX-137 recipients
    $6.4B
  92. 92
    TN-018 recipients
    $6.4B
  93. 93
    GA-0117 recipients
    $6.4B
  94. 94
    OH-133 recipients
    $6.3B
  95. 95
    FL-184 recipients
    $6.3B
  96. 96
    VA-0733 recipients
    $6.3B
  97. 97
    PA-1315 recipients
    $6.2B
  98. 98
    MN-0412 recipients
    $6.2B
  99. 99
    SC-0213 recipients
    $6.2B
  100. 100
    PA-089 recipients
    $6.2B

The source's own congressional-district field is frequently missing or wrong, so these figures are derived and labeled inferred throughout the site. State-level figures are reliable; district-level ones are our best reading of the same records.

Questions

Which congressional district receives the most federal spending in FY2020?
IN-07, with $129.7B of federal work performed there in FY2020. District figures are inferred from place of performance.
Why are district figures inferred rather than reported?
Because the congressional-district field on federal award records is frequently blank or stale. We derive the district from the reported place of performance instead, and say so on every page that shows one.
Where does this ranking come from?
It is computed from USASpending.gov award records, which are U.S. government works and in the public domain. Each figure is the federal work performed in that district in FY2020, inferred from place of performance. TheFiscalFinder does the ranking; the underlying figures are the government's own.
How many districts are shown?
The top 100 for FY2020. Each row opens that district's own page, where the same money is broken out by year, by counterparty and by place.
Does a high position mean anything is wrong?
No. This is a description of where public money went in FY2020, computed from public records. It is not an allegation about anyone on it.

Related rankings

Top states by federal spending receivedTop contractors of the Department of StateTop federal sub-agencies by spendingTop federal assistance programs
← All rankingsLeaderboards →
🔎
Why the labels? The graph is only worth anything if the links are trusted. Facts taken straight from a federal filing are ✓ from source; figures we calculate are ≈ computed; links we infer (corporate parents, districts, competitors, connections between records) are ≈ inferred, worded carefully, never asserted as fact and never a claim that one thing caused another. Spot an error? Tell us.