Top contractors of the Department of Health and Human Services: FY2025
≈ computed · agency obligationsHealth Care Services, California Department of received more money from the Department of Health and Human Services than any other recipient in FY2025: $112.5B in obligations. Ranked by what the Department of Health and Human Services obligated to each recipient in FY2025, so the list is about this agency's money rather than a contractor's overall size. Combined corporate families count once. ≈ computed
Ranked from USASpending records, data current as of 2026-09-01. FY2020 to FY2025 are loaded.
- 1$112.5B
- 2NYS Department of Health0 awards$75B
- 3Health & Human SVC Commn TX0 awards$33B
- 4PA Department of Human Services0 awards$31.9B
- 5Ohio Department of Medicaid0 awards$27.7B
- 6$27.7B
- 7$22.8B
- 8$21.9B
- 9$20.9B
- 10$18.1B
- 11$17.2B
- 12$16.8B
- 13$16.8B
- 14Indiana Family and Social Serv0 awards$16.5B
- 15$16.4B
- 16Lousiana Department of Health0 awards$14.6B
- 17$13.8B
- 18$13.7B
- 19$13B
- 20$13B
- 21$12.9B
- 22$11.9B
- 23Maryland Department of Health0 awards$11.6B
- 24$10B
- 25$9.5B
- 26New Mexico Health Care Authority0 awards$8.6B
- 27$7.9B
- 28Oklahoma Health Care Authority0 awards$7.9B
- 29$7.7B
- 30IA Department of Human Services0 awards$7.4B
- 31$7.2B
- 32$6.7B
- 33Alabama Medicaid Agency0 awards$6.6B
- 34$6.1B
- 35Mississippi Division of Medicaid0 awards$6B
- 36$4.7B
- 37$4.3B
- 38$3.9B
- 39$3.8B
- 40$3.7B
- 41$3.6B
- 42$3.6B
- 43Puerto Rico Department of Health0 awards$3.4B
- 44$3.3B
- 45Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC0 awards$2.9B
- 46$2.7B
- 47$2.7B
- 48$2.3B
- 49$2.3B
- 50$2.3B
- 51$2B
- 52Human Services Vermont Agency of0 awards$1.7B
- 53$1.4B
- 54$1.2B
- 55$1.2B
- 56$1.2B
- 57Texas Workforce Commission0 awards$1.2B
- 58$1.2B
- 59Sanofi Vaccines US Inc.0 awards$1.1B
- 60$1B
- 61Glaxosmithkline, LLC0 awards$979.7M
- 62$967.4M
- 63Maximus Federal Services, Inc.0 awards$949.7M
- 64The Johns Hopkins University0 awards$900.9M
- 65$871.5M
- 66General Dynamics Corporation0 awards$839.3M
- 67$827.4M
- 68Leidos, Inc.0 awards$793.6M
- 69$767.6M
- 70$735.8M
- 71$735.6M
- 72Washington University, the0 awards$732.7M
- 73$722.5M
- 74$722M
- 75Pfizer Inc0 awards$698.7M
- 76$692.8M
- 77$691.7M
- 78Yale Univ0 awards$688.8M
- 79Southwest Key Programs Inc0 awards$666.9M
- 80The General Hospital Corporation0 awards$664.8M
- 81$644.3M
- 82Duke University0 awards$638.5M
- 83Department of Human Services0 awards$628.5M
- 84Emory University0 awards$616M
- 85Florida Department of Education0 awards$615.4M
- 86$606.9M
- 87$594.2M
- 88Human Services, Oklahoma Dept of0 awards$580M
- 89$578.6M
- 90Maryland Health Benefit Exchange0 awards$577.8M
- 91$563.9M
- 92University of Washington0 awards$556.4M
- 93$554.5M
- 94$554.3M
- 95$545.8M
- 96$533M
- 97New York University0 awards$528.7M
- 98Department of Health Wyoming0 awards$528.4M
- 99$510.7M
- 100$510.5M
Obligations are the dollars the agency committed, which is not the same as dollars paid out. A recipient can appear on several agencies' lists; each ranks only its own money.
Questions
- Who is the Department of Health and Human Services's biggest contractor in FY2025?
- Health Care Services, California Department of, with $112.5B obligated in FY2025. Second is NYS Department of Health at $75B.
- Where does this ranking come from?
- It is computed from USASpending.gov award records, which are U.S. government works and in the public domain. Each figure is the total the Department of Health and Human Services obligated to that recipient in FY2025. TheFiscalFinder does the ranking; the underlying figures are the government's own.
- How many recipients are shown?
- The top 100 for FY2025. Each row opens that recipient's own page, where the same money is broken out by year, by counterparty and by place.
- Does a high position mean anything is wrong?
- No. This is a description of where public money went in FY2025, computed from public records. It is not an allegation about anyone on it.
Related rankings
🔎
Why the labels? The graph is only worth anything if the links are trusted. Facts taken straight from a federal filing are ✓ from source; figures we calculate are ≈ computed; links we infer (corporate parents, districts, competitors, connections between records) are ≈ inferred, worded carefully, never asserted as fact and never a claim that one thing caused another. Spot an error? Tell us.