Top contractors of the Department of Health and Human Services: FY2020
≈ computed · agency obligationsUnitedHealth Group received more money from the Department of Health and Human Services than any other recipient in FY2020: $101.4B in obligations. Ranked by what the Department of Health and Human Services obligated to each recipient in FY2020, so the list is about this agency's money rather than a contractor's overall size. Combined corporate families count once. ≈ computed
Ranked from USASpending records, data current as of 2026-07-12. FY2020 to FY2025 are loaded.
- 1UnitedHealth Group0 awards$101.4B
- 2$66.8B
- 3NYS Department of Health0 awards$51B
- 4Health & Human SVC Commn TX0 awards$30.9B
- 5PA Department of Human Services0 awards$26.6B
- 6$21.7B
- 7$18.8B
- 8$17.1B
- 9$14.5B
- 10$13.5B
- 11$12.5B
- 12$12.4B
- 13$12.1B
- 14$12.1B
- 15$10.7B
- 16Indiana Family and Social Serv0 awards$10.6B
- 17$10.1B
- 18$9.8B
- 19$9.8B
- 20Lousiana Department of Health0 awards$9.5B
- 21$9.3B
- 22$9.1B
- 23$8.6B
- 24Maryland Department of Health0 awards$8.6B
- 25Maryland Department of Health0 awards$8.3B
- 26$8.1B
- 27$6.9B
- 28$6.7B
- 29$6.2B
- 30$6.1B
- 31New Mexico Health Care Authority0 awards$5.7B
- 32$5.7B
- 33$5.7B
- 34$5.5B
- 35Alabama Medicaid Agency0 awards$5.5B
- 36Mississippi Division of Medicaid0 awards$5B
- 37IA Department of Human Services0 awards$4.6B
- 38$4.1B
- 39Oklahoma Health Care Authority0 awards$4B
- 40$3.8B
- 41$3.6B
- 42$3.5B
- 43$3.3B
- 44Puerto Rico Department of Health0 awards$3B
- 45$3B
- 46$2.9B
- 47$2.8B
- 48$2.5B
- 49$2.3B
- 50$2.1B
- 51$2B
- 52$1.9B
- 53$1.9B
- 54Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC0 awards$1.9B
- 55$1.9B
- 56$1.6B
- 57Leidos, Inc.0 awards$1.5B
- 58Human Services Vermont Agency of0 awards$1.5B
- 59$1.5B
- 60$1.3B
- 61$1.3B
- 62$1.2B
- 63Texas Workforce Commission0 awards$1.2B
- 64Pfizer Inc0 awards$1.2B
- 65$1.1B
- 66$1.1B
- 67$1.1B
- 68$1B
- 69City of New York0 awards$1B
- 70City of New York0 awards$1B
- 71Sanofi Vaccines US Inc.0 awards$965.8M
- 72Modernatx, Inc.0 awards$954.9M
- 73Health Research, Inc.0 awards$948.5M
- 74Glaxosmithkline, LLC0 awards$948.4M
- 75The Johns Hopkins University0 awards$897.6M
- 76Florida Department of Health0 awards$890.4M
- 77$881.9M
- 78$865.1M
- 79$825.9M
- 80Health, New Jersey Department of0 awards$820.6M
- 81$814.5M
- 82$780.4M
- 83$775M
- 84Florida Department of Education0 awards$747.2M
- 85$732.3M
- 86Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.0 awards$724.7M
- 87$695.9M
- 88$687M
- 89$672.8M
- 90Human Services, Oklahoma Dept of0 awards$660.2M
- 91Philips North America LLC0 awards$648M
- 92Duke University0 awards$640.1M
- 93Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc0 awards$638.4M
- 94Maximus Federal Services, Inc.0 awards$628.6M
- 95Dept Family & Protective Ser0 awards$619.4M
- 96$618.2M
- 97University of Washington0 awards$617.1M
- 98$612.4M
- 99$609M
- 100Department of Human Services0 awards$606.3M
Obligations are the dollars the agency committed, which is not the same as dollars paid out. A recipient can appear on several agencies' lists; each ranks only its own money.
Questions
- Who is the Department of Health and Human Services's biggest contractor in FY2020?
- UnitedHealth Group, with $101.4B obligated in FY2020. Second is Health Care Services, California Department of at $66.8B.
- Where does this ranking come from?
- It is computed from USASpending.gov award records, which are U.S. government works and in the public domain. Each figure is the total the Department of Health and Human Services obligated to that recipient in FY2020. TheFiscalFinder does the ranking; the underlying figures are the government's own.
- How many recipients are shown?
- The top 100 for FY2020. Each row opens that recipient's own page, where the same money is broken out by year, by counterparty and by place.
- Does a high position mean anything is wrong?
- No. This is a description of where public money went in FY2020, computed from public records. It is not an allegation about anyone on it.
Related rankings
🔎
Why the labels? The graph is only worth anything if the links are trusted. Facts taken straight from a federal filing are ✓ from source; figures we calculate are ≈ computed; links we infer (corporate parents, districts, competitors, connections between records) are ≈ inferred, worded carefully, never asserted as fact and never a claim that one thing caused another. Spot an error? Tell us.