Contractor profile

General Atomics

FY2026 ended Sep 30 · data still posting · data as of 2026-11-01†

† DoD contract data posts to USAspending about 90 days after award.

prime recipient of federal awards · part of General Atomics Inferred · UEI TVRYQ3N3B8H5 Source
$625.9M
Obligated
FY2026 · data still posting
3
Funding agencies
68%
From Defense
4
States
97%
In California
10
Industries

In FY2026, General Atomics received $625.9M in federal awards from 3 agencies, 68% of it from the Department of Defense, with 97% of the work performed in California. Across FY2020 to FY2026 its recorded total is $3.3B. FY2026 ended Sep 30 and its data is still posting. Computed

Where this money comes from

Source
FUNDING AGENCIES
GENERAL ATOMICS
Defense
$0.4B
Energy
$0.2B
1 other agencies
$0B
General Atomics
$0.6B
FY2026 obligated
band width = obligations · FY2026 · source: USASpending.gov

Where the work lands

Source
California$604.3M
Mississippi$21.2M
Maryland$397.7K
Alabama$500

Key takeaways

Computed
FY2026 ended Sep 30 · data still posting · data as of 2026-11-01
  • General Atomics received $625.9M in federal obligations in FY2026 (data still posting), compared with $518.6M in FY2025.
  • The Department of Defense accounted for 68% of it.
  • Its largest recorded industry was Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing, at $418.2M.
  • California was its largest place of performance, with 96% of the work.

Obligations by year

Computed
$535.6M
FY20
$376.4M
FY21
$343.7M
FY22
$579.5M
FY23
$355.5M
FY24
$518.6M
FY25
$625.9M
FY26 partial
▼ 3%
FY20 to FY25

Awards

Source

Largest active awards by total value

Awards whose period of performance overlaps FY2026, by the amount obligated on each so far.

AwardIDAgencyObligatedStartEndPlace
CVN 79 Emals Long Lead Time MaterialN0001914C0037Department of Defense$1.8B2014-05-082030-01-30California
Diii-D National Fusion Program and Advanced Fusion Technology Research and DevelopmentDEFC0204ER54698Department of Energy$1.3B2003-11-012027-07-31California
CVN 81 Emals Pre-Production PlanningN0001922C0033Department of Defense$762.9M2022-01-012032-02-28California
Emals & Aag FFC Development Phase 1N0001925F0028Department of Defense$110.5M2025-01-012028-03-31California
Research & Development and Fabrication of Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) Targets for…89233124CNA000365Department of Energy$92.4M2024-10-012029-09-30California
Project 7756N6600122C4700Department of Defense$75.9M2022-05-092026-08-31California
IN the 2012 Consolidated Appropriations Act, Congress Appropriated Funds to DOE for the…DENE0009235Department of Energy$35.2M2022-12-282027-12-27California
Theory and Simulation of Fusion PlasmasDEFG0295ER54309Department of Energy$32.9M1995-02-152027-03-31California

Largest FY2026 awards

Awards that started in FY2026, by the amount obligated on each so far.

No award on record started in FY2026.

What it does (NAICS / PSC)

Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing$418.2M
Office of Science Financial Assistance Program$124.6M
Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)$48M
Other Basic Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing$19.5M
Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing$5.2M
Ship Building and Repairing$5M
Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy$2.3M
Hardware Manufacturing$777.6K

Corporate family

Part ofGeneral Atomics →Inferred

One registration (UEI TVRYQ3N3B8H5) of the combined recipient above.

Political contributions

General Atomics Political Action CommitteeInferredgave$1.7Mto members of CongressSource
Pete Aguilar (Democrat)$40K
Mario Diaz-Balart (Republican)$40K
Betty McCollum (Democrat)$40K
Scott H. Peters (Democrat)$40K
Mike Rogers (Republican)$40K
Trent Kelly (Republican)$37.5K
Robert B. Aderholt (Republican)$37K
Tom Cole (Republican)$36K
Sam Graves (Republican)$35K
Marcy Kaptur (Democrat)$32.5K

linked through public filings, not a claim of coordination. contribution reported to the FEC, a public campaign-finance record.

Related

Why the labels? The graph is only worth anything if the links are trusted. Facts taken straight from a federal filing are Source; figures we calculate are Computed; links we infer (corporate parents, districts, similar contractors, connections between records) are Inferred, worded carefully, never asserted as fact and never a claim that one thing caused another. Spot an error? Tell us.