Contractor profile

AECOM Technical Services, Inc.

FY2026 ended Sep 30 · data still posting · data as of 2026-11-01†

† DoD contract data posts to USAspending about 90 days after award.

prime recipient of federal awards · UEI EPUXNLX5EYC4 Source
$311.4M
Obligated
FY2026 · data still posting
10
Funding agencies
42%
From Defense
0%
Non-competed
10
States
19%
In Texas
10
Industries

In FY2026, AECOM Technical Services, Inc. received $311.4M in federal awards from 10 agencies, 42% of it from the Department of Defense, with 19% of the work performed in Texas. Across FY2020 to FY2026 its recorded total is $3.5B. FY2026 ended Sep 30 and its data is still posting. Computed

Where this money comes from

Source
FUNDING AGENCIES
AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES
Defense
$0.1B
9 other agencies
$0.2B
AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
$0.3B
FY2026 obligated
band width = obligations · FY2026 · source: USASpending.gov

Where the work lands

Source
Texas$58.8M
Hawaii$33.3M
Michigan$24.9M
Colorado$13.4M
Maryland$13.1M
Virginia$12.7M

State breakdown available for 82% of obligations shown

Key takeaways

Computed
FY2026 ended Sep 30 · data still posting · data as of 2026-11-01
  • AECOM Technical Services, Inc. received $311.4M in federal obligations in FY2026 (data still posting), compared with $381.2M in FY2025.
  • The Department of Defense accounted for 41% of it.
  • Its largest recorded industry was Engineering Services, at $216.4M.
  • Texas was its largest place of performance, with 18% of the work.

Obligations by year

Computed
$520M
FY20
$403.1M
FY21
$514.1M
FY22
$660.8M
FY23
$729.7M
FY24
$381.2M
FY25
$311.4M
FY26 partial
▼ 27%
FY20 to FY25

Awards

Source

Largest active awards by total value

Awards whose period of performance overlaps FY2026, by the amount obligated on each so far.

Largest FY2026 awards

Awards that started in FY2026, by the amount obligated on each so far.

No award on record started in FY2026.

Competition

0%non-competed (often called no-bid), of $311.3M in contract obligations in FY2026Computed

This describes how contracts were awarded, not wrongdoing.

Similar federal contractors

Computed

Corporate family

Single registration: no combined family.

Related

Why the labels? The graph is only worth anything if the links are trusted. Facts taken straight from a federal filing are Source; figures we calculate are Computed; links we infer (corporate parents, districts, similar contractors, connections between records) are Inferred, worded carefully, never asserted as fact and never a claim that one thing caused another. Spot an error? Tell us.