Contractors / Philips North America LLC
Philips North America LLC
prime recipient of federal awards · UEI T41NB3MDAPZ6 ✓ from source
$162.8M
obligated · FY2025
4
funding agencies
75%
from Veterans Affai…
0%
single-source
10
states
71%
in Washington
10
industries
≈ computedSingle-source: 0% of this recipient’s $162.8M in federal contracts was awarded without competition (FPDS extent-competed codes); the rest was competed or unclassified. A high share often reflects sole-source or specialized work, not wrongdoing.
Obligations by year
≈ computed$134.7M
FY22
$165.4M
FY23
$172M
FY24
$162.8M
FY25
▲ 21%
since FY22
Where this money comes from
✓ from sourceFUNDING AGENCIES
PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LL
Veterans Affairs
$0.1B
3 other agencies
$0B
Philips North America LLC
$0.2B
FY2025 obligated
Biggest awards (total value)
awarded 2020$68.2M
Total value over each award’s life, for awards active in FY2025: a decades-long contract can exceed one year’s obligations above.
What it does (NAICS / PSC)
Software Publishers$187.1K
Where the work lands
Washington✓ from source$115.7M
Texas✓ from source$8.6M
California✓ from source$4.3M
North Carolina✓ from source$4.1M
New York✓ from source$2.9M
Missouri✓ from source$2.2M
Colorado✓ from source$1.6M
Ohio✓ from source$1.6M
Competitors
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.≈ computed$156.4M
GE Precision Healthcare LLC≈ computed$154.4M
Smiths Detection Inc.≈ computed$82.7M
Rapiscan Systems Inc≈ computed$74.9M
Leidos, Inc.≈ computed$50.4M
computed from shared NAICS, not a stated rivalry.
Corporate family
Single registration: no combined family.
Political contributions
Philips North America LLC Political Action Committee≈ inferredgave$427.8Kto members of Congress✓ from source
Mike Bost (Republican)$22.5K
Mark Takano (Democrat)$14.5K
linked through public filings, not a claim of coordination. contribution reported to the FEC, a public campaign-finance record.
🔎
Why the labels? The graph is only worth anything if the links are trusted. Facts taken straight from a federal filing are ✓ from source; figures we calculate are ≈ computed; links we infer (corporate parents, districts, competitors, connections between records) are ≈ inferred, worded carefully, never asserted as fact and never a claim that one thing caused another. Spot an error? Tell us.