Contractors / Odyssey Systems Consulting Group, Ltd.
Odyssey Systems Consulting Group, Ltd.
prime recipient of federal awards · UEI GUXLUYETMM48 ✓ from source
$424.5M
obligated · FY2025
2
funding agencies
100%
from Defense
0%
single-source
7
states
98%
in Massachusetts
6
industries
≈ computedSingle-source: 0% of this recipient’s $424.5M in federal contracts was awarded without competition (FPDS extent-competed codes); the rest was competed or unclassified. A high share often reflects sole-source or specialized work, not wrongdoing.
Obligations by year
≈ computed$178.7M
FY20
$260.1M
FY23
$390.2M
FY24
$424.5M
FY25
▲ 138%
since FY20
Where this money comes from
✓ from sourceFUNDING AGENCIES
ODYSSEY SYSTEMS CONSULTI
Defense
$0.4B
1 other agencies
$0B
Odyssey Systems Consulting Group, Ltd.
$0.4B
FY2025 obligated
Biggest awards (total value)
awarded 2024$456.3M
awarded 2015$313M
awarded 2023$207.6M
awarded 2022$179.5M
awarded 2018$153.9M
awarded 2015$142.7M
awarded 2024$134.4M
awarded 2024$113.1M
Total value over each award’s life, for awards active in FY2025: a decades-long contract can exceed one year’s obligations above.
What it does (NAICS / PSC)
Where the work lands
Massachusetts✓ from source$414.5M
Maryland✓ from source$5.9M
Colorado✓ from source$1.3M
Virginia✓ from source$1.1M
Ohio✓ from source$886K
Florida✓ from source$784.4K
California✓ from source$145.7K
Competitors
Massachusetts Institute of Technology≈ computed$1.4B
Brookhaven Science Associates LLC≈ computed$833.7M
Torch Technologies Inc≈ computed$505.3M
Science Applications International Corporation≈ computed$486.2M
Amentum Technology, Inc.≈ computed$388.1M
Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation≈ computed$324.2M
KBR, Inc.≈ computed$313.3M
Aerojet Rocketdyne of DE, Inc≈ computed$299.2M
computed from shared NAICS, not a stated rivalry.
Corporate family
Single registration: no combined family.
🔎
Why the labels? The graph is only worth anything if the links are trusted. Facts taken straight from a federal filing are ✓ from source; figures we calculate are ≈ computed; links we infer (corporate parents, districts, competitors, connections between records) are ≈ inferred, worded carefully, never asserted as fact and never a claim that one thing caused another. Spot an error? Tell us.