Contractor profile

M. A. Mortenson Company

FY2026 ended Sep 30 · data still posting · data as of 2026-11-01†

† DoD contract data posts to USAspending about 90 days after award.

prime recipient of federal awards · UEI GPXRWUEUHZ19 Source
$903.9M
Obligated
FY2026 · data still posting
5
Funding agencies
74%
From Defense
0%
Non-competed
10
States
73%
In Texas
3
Industries

In FY2026, M. A. Mortenson Company received $903.9M in federal awards from 5 agencies, 74% of it from the Department of Defense, with 73% of the work performed in Texas. Across FY2022 to FY2026 its recorded total is $1.4B. FY2026 ended Sep 30 and its data is still posting. Computed

Where this money comes from

Source
FUNDING AGENCIES
M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY
Defense
$0.7B
HHS
$0.2B
M. A. Mortenson Company
$0.9B
FY2026 obligated
band width = obligations · FY2026 · source: USASpending.gov

Where the work lands

Source
Texas$660.5M
Maryland$240.2M
Georgia$1.5M
Utah$656.6K
Virginia$613.3K
Nebraska$393.2K
Colorado$104.1K

Key takeaways

Computed
FY2026 ended Sep 30 · data still posting · data as of 2026-11-01
  • M. A. Mortenson Company received $903.9M in federal obligations in FY2026 (data still posting).
  • The Department of Defense accounted for 73% of it.
  • Its largest recorded industry was Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, at $900.3M.
  • Texas was its largest place of performance, with 73% of the work.

Obligations by year

Computed
$144.4M
FY22
$191M
FY23
$163.1M
FY24
$903.9M
FY26 partial
▲ 13%
FY22 to FY24

Awards

Source

Largest active awards by total value

Awards whose period of performance overlaps FY2026, by the amount obligated on each so far.

Largest FY2026 awards

Awards that started in FY2026, by the amount obligated on each so far.

Competition

0%non-competed (often called no-bid), of $903.9M in contract obligations in FY2026Computed

This describes how contracts were awarded, not wrongdoing.

Similar federal contractors

Computed

Corporate family

Single registration: no combined family.

Related

Why the labels? The graph is only worth anything if the links are trusted. Facts taken straight from a federal filing are Source; figures we calculate are Computed; links we infer (corporate parents, districts, similar contractors, connections between records) are Inferred, worded carefully, never asserted as fact and never a claim that one thing caused another. Spot an error? Tell us.