Contractor profile

Georgia Tech Applied Research Corp

FY2026 ended Sep 30 · data still posting · data as of 2026-11-01†

† DoD contract data posts to USAspending about 90 days after award.

prime recipient of federal awards · reported division of Georgia Tech Research Corp Inferred · UEI L3G5SBQ2PLK5 Source
$420.7M
Obligated
FY2026 · data still posting
6
Funding agencies
100%
From Defense
76%
Non-competed
10
States
86%
In Georgia
9
Industries

In FY2026, Georgia Tech Applied Research Corp received $420.7M in federal awards from 6 agencies, 100% of it from the Department of Defense, with 86% of the work performed in Georgia. Across FY2020 to FY2026 its recorded total is $3.9B. FY2026 ended Sep 30 and its data is still posting. Computed

Where this money comes from

Source
FUNDING AGENCIES
GEORGIA TECH APPLIED RES
Defense
$0.4B
5 other agencies
$0B
Georgia Tech Applied Research Corp
$0.4B
FY2026 obligated
band width = obligations · FY2026 · source: USASpending.gov

Where the work lands

Source
Georgia$361.6M
Utah$30.4M
Oklahoma$12.1M
Alabama$5.5M
Ohio$1.2M

Key takeaways

Computed
FY2026 ended Sep 30 · data still posting · data as of 2026-11-01
  • Georgia Tech Applied Research Corp received $420.7M in federal obligations in FY2026 (data still posting), compared with $477.7M in FY2025.
  • The Department of Defense accounted for 99% of it.
  • Of its $417.1M in contract obligations, 76% was non-competed, based on FPDS extent-competed codes.
  • Its largest recorded industry was Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology), at $349.1M.

Obligations by year

Computed
$597.9M
FY20
$582.3M
FY21
$655.6M
FY22
$677M
FY23
$520.4M
FY24
$477.7M
FY25
$420.7M
FY26 partial
▼ 20%
FY20 to FY25

Awards

Source

Largest FY2026 awards

Awards that started in FY2026, by the amount obligated on each so far.

No award on record started in FY2026.

Competition

76%non-competed (often called no-bid), of $417.1M in contract obligations in FY2026Computed

This describes how contracts were awarded, not wrongdoing.

Similar federal contractors

Computed

Corporate family

Reported division ofGeorgia Tech Research Corp →Inferred

Related

Why the labels? The graph is only worth anything if the links are trusted. Facts taken straight from a federal filing are Source; figures we calculate are Computed; links we infer (corporate parents, districts, similar contractors, connections between records) are Inferred, worded carefully, never asserted as fact and never a claim that one thing caused another. Spot an error? Tell us.