Contractor profile
General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.
FY2026 ended Sep 30 · data still posting · data as of 2026-11-01†
† DoD contract data posts to USAspending about 90 days after award.
prime recipient of federal awards · part of General Dynamics Corporation Inferred · UEI MWDRZJ2ZVPV7 Source
$562.5M
Obligated
FY2026 · data still posting
10
Funding agencies
88%
From Defense
10
States
93%
In Arizona
10
Industries
In FY2026, General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc. received $562.5M in federal awards from 10 agencies, 88% of it from the Department of Defense, with 93% of the work performed in Arizona. Across FY2020 to FY2026 its recorded total is $4.2B. FY2026 ended Sep 30 and its data is still posting. Computed
Where this money comes from
SourceFUNDING AGENCIES
GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION
Defense
$0.5B
9 other agencies
$0.1B
General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.
$0.6B
FY2026 obligated
Where the work lands
SourceArizona$522.6M
Maryland$13.1M
New Mexico$12.5M
Hawaii$9.7M
Massachusetts$1.5M
Indiana$1.4M
Michigan$843.9K
Florida$238.9K
Key takeaways
Computed- General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc. received $562.5M in federal obligations in FY2026 (data still posting), compared with $735.3M in FY2025.
- The Department of Defense accounted for 88% of it.
- Its largest recorded industry was Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology), at $254M.
- Arizona was its largest place of performance, with 92% of the work.
Obligations by year
Computed$547.1M
FY20
$521.4M
FY21
$473.9M
FY22
$583.2M
FY23
$744M
FY24
$735.3M
FY25
$562.5M
FY26 partial
▲ 34%
FY20 to FY25
Awards
SourceLargest active awards by total value
Awards whose period of performance overlaps FY2026, by the amount obligated on each so far.
| Award | ID | Agency | Obligated | Start | End | Place |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sda Tranche 1 Operations and Integration | HQ085022C0007 | Department of Defense | $1.1B | 2022-05-26 | 2029-09-30 | Arizona |
| Nexcom Segment II, Uhf/VHF Radios | DTFAWA12C00040 | Department of Transportation | $386.5M | 2012-05-02 | 2027-02-27 | Arizona |
| R21 Coastal Sustainment Services Firm Fixed Pric Task Order | 70Z04421F21002700 | Department of Homeland Security | $255.5M | 2021-04-01 | 2026-06-30 | Arizona |
| Mobile User Objective System Ground Sustainment | FA880724F0003 | Department of Defense | $158.1M | 2026-08-31 | 2027-10-05 | Arizona |
| Contract FA830717C0003 | FA830717C0003 | Department of Defense | $88.4M | 2016-11-10 | 2026-03-28 | Arizona |
| Labor - MUOS Ground System Sustainment | N0003921F6001 | Department of Defense | $68.2M | 2020-11-08 | 2026-04-27 | Arizona |
| Medium/Largesat Common Solutions End Cryptographic Units | FA830721F0097 | Department of Defense | $59.6M | 2021-06-30 | 2027-03-31 | Arizona |
| Sustainment Activities for Modification Kits to Correct Deficiencies (Including… | FA880726FB006 | Department of Defense | $57.7M | 2026-05-22 | 2029-09-30 | Arizona |
Largest FY2026 awards
Awards that started in FY2026, by the amount obligated on each so far.
| Award | ID | Agency | Obligated | Start | End | Place |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile User Objective System Ground Sustainment | FA880724F0003 | Department of Defense | $158.1M | 2026-08-31 | 2027-10-05 | Arizona |
| Sustainment Activities for Modification Kits to Correct Deficiencies (Including… | FA880726FB006 | Department of Defense | $57.7M | 2026-05-22 | 2029-09-30 | Arizona |
What it does (NAICS / PSC)
Engineering Services$54.9M
Corporate family
One registration (UEI MWDRZJ2ZVPV7) of the combined recipient above.
Related
- Top contractors of the Department of Defense Its largest funding agency, ranked by recipient
- Department of Defense Its largest funding agency
- Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology) Its largest recorded category
- Arizona Where most of its work is performed
- Computing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, Web Hosting, and Related Services Another of its largest categories
Why the labels? The graph is only worth anything if the links are trusted. Facts taken straight from a federal filing are Source; figures we calculate are Computed; links we infer (corporate parents, districts, similar contractors, connections between records) are Inferred, worded carefully, never asserted as fact and never a claim that one thing caused another. Spot an error? Tell us.