Contractor profile

Flightsafety Defense Corporation

FY2026 ended Sep 30 · data still posting · data as of 2026-11-01†

† DoD contract data posts to USAspending about 90 days after award.

prime recipient of federal awards · UEI G6ZEWHPSV5D9 Source
$665.1M
Obligated
FY2026 · data still posting
1
Funding agencies
100%
From Defense
1%
Non-competed
5
States
98%
In Texas
4
Industries

In FY2026, Flightsafety Defense Corporation received $665.1M in federal awards from the Department of Defense, with 98% of the work performed in Texas. FY2026 ended Sep 30 and its data is still posting. Computed

Where this money comes from

Source
FUNDING AGENCIES
FLIGHTSAFETY DEFENSE COR
Defense
$0.7B
Flightsafety Defense Corporation
$0.7B
FY2026 obligated
band width = obligations · FY2026 · source: USASpending.gov

Where the work lands

Source
Texas$651.1M
Florida$9.8M
Colorado$816.1K
Oklahoma$87.1K

Key takeaways

Computed
FY2026 ended Sep 30 · data still posting · data as of 2026-11-01
  • Flightsafety Defense Corporation received $665.1M in federal obligations in FY2026 (data still posting).
  • The Department of Defense accounted for 100% of it.
  • Of its $665.1M in contract obligations, 1% was non-competed, based on FPDS extent-competed codes.
  • Its largest recorded industry was Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing, at $641.2M.

Awards

Source

Largest active awards by total value

Awards whose period of performance overlaps FY2026, by the amount obligated on each so far.

AwardIDAgencyObligatedStartEndPlace
KC-46 Aircrew Training System (ATS)FA862113C6247Department of Defense$1.2B2013-05-012026-12-31Texas
Japan Air Self-Defense Force (JASDF) KC-46 Aircrew Training System (ATS)FA862123CB002Department of Defense$56.1M2023-07-112028-04-30Texas

Largest FY2026 awards

Awards that started in FY2026, by the amount obligated on each so far.

No award on record started in FY2026.

Competition

1%non-competed (often called no-bid), of $665.1M in contract obligations in FY2026Computed

This describes how contracts were awarded, not wrongdoing.

Similar federal contractors

Computed

Corporate family

Single registration: no combined family.

Related

Why the labels? The graph is only worth anything if the links are trusted. Facts taken straight from a federal filing are Source; figures we calculate are Computed; links we infer (corporate parents, districts, similar contractors, connections between records) are Inferred, worded carefully, never asserted as fact and never a claim that one thing caused another. Spot an error? Tell us.