Contractor profile
Cherokee Nation Federal Consulting, L.l.c.
FY2022 · complete year · data as of 2026-07-11
No FY2026 activity recorded for this recipient. Showing FY2022, its most recent year with data.
prime recipient of federal awards · UEI EZAFPH5GL3E9 Source
$129.7M
Obligated
FY2022
5
Funding agencies
96%
From the Treasury
7%
Non-competed
9
States
93%
In Missouri
5
Industries
In FY2022, Cherokee Nation Federal Consulting, L.l.c. received $129.7M in federal awards from 5 agencies, 96% of it from the Department of the Treasury, with 93% of the work performed in Missouri. Computed
Where this money comes from
SourceFUNDING AGENCIES
CHEROKEE NATION FEDERAL
the Treasury
$0.1B
4 other agencies
$0B
Cherokee Nation Federal Consulting, L.l.c.
$0.1B
FY2022 obligated
Key takeaways
Computed- Cherokee Nation Federal Consulting, L.l.c. received $129.7M in federal obligations in FY2022.
- The Department of the Treasury accounted for 95% of it.
- Of its $129.7M in contract obligations, 7% was non-competed, based on FPDS extent-competed codes.
- Its largest recorded industry was Office Administrative Services, at $120.2M.
Awards
SourceLargest active awards by total value
Awards whose period of performance overlaps FY2022, by the amount obligated on each so far.
No award on record was active in FY2022.
Largest FY2022 awards
Awards that started in FY2022, by the amount obligated on each so far.
No award on record started in FY2022.
What it does (NAICS / PSC)
Competition
7%non-competed (often called no-bid), of $129.7M in contract obligations in FY2022Computed
This describes how contracts were awarded, not wrongdoing.
Corporate family
Single registration: no combined family.
Related
- Department of the Treasury Its largest funding agency
- Office Administrative Services Its largest recorded category
- Missouri Where most of its work is performed
- Most no-bid contract dollars Non-competed contract dollars, ranked
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services Another of its largest categories
Why the labels? The graph is only worth anything if the links are trusted. Facts taken straight from a federal filing are Source; figures we calculate are Computed; links we infer (corporate parents, districts, similar contractors, connections between records) are Inferred, worded carefully, never asserted as fact and never a claim that one thing caused another. Spot an error? Tell us.