Contractor profile

Akima Facilities Operations LLC

FY2026 ended Sep 30 · data still posting · data as of 2026-11-01†

† DoD contract data posts to USAspending about 90 days after award.

prime recipient of federal awards · UEI K218AKKG7SH6 Source
$223.2M
Obligated
FY2026 · data still posting
6
Funding agencies
90%
From Defense
22%
Non-competed
10
States
21%
In Alabama
10
Industries

In FY2026, Akima Facilities Operations LLC received $223.2M in federal awards from 6 agencies, 90% of it from the Department of Defense, with 21% of the work performed in Alabama. Across FY2024 to FY2026 its recorded total is $628.7M. FY2026 ended Sep 30 and its data is still posting. Computed

Where this money comes from

Source
FUNDING AGENCIES
AKIMA FACILITIES OPERATI
Defense
$0.2B
5 other agencies
$0B
Akima Facilities Operations LLC
$0.2B
FY2026 obligated
band width = obligations · FY2026 · source: USASpending.gov

Where the work lands

Source
Alabama$47.1M
Virginia$30.9M
Texas$24.4M
Colorado$23.3M
Maryland$19.6M

State breakdown available for 93% of obligations shown

Key takeaways

Computed
FY2026 ended Sep 30 · data still posting · data as of 2026-11-01
  • Akima Facilities Operations LLC received $223.2M in federal obligations in FY2026 (data still posting), compared with $223.2M in FY2025.
  • The Department of Defense accounted for 90% of it.
  • Of its $223.2M in contract obligations, 22% was non-competed, based on FPDS extent-competed codes.
  • Its largest recorded industry was Facilities Support Services, at $202.8M.

Obligations by year

Computed
$182.2M
FY24
$223.2M
FY25
$223.2M
FY26 partial
▲ 23%
FY24 to FY25

Awards

Source

Largest active awards by total value

Awards whose period of performance overlaps FY2026, by the amount obligated on each so far.

Largest FY2026 awards

Awards that started in FY2026, by the amount obligated on each so far.

No award on record started in FY2026.

Competition

22%non-competed (often called no-bid), of $223.2M in contract obligations in FY2026Computed

This describes how contracts were awarded, not wrongdoing.

Similar federal contractors

Computed

Corporate family

Single registration: no combined family.

Related

Why the labels? The graph is only worth anything if the links are trusted. Facts taken straight from a federal filing are Source; figures we calculate are Computed; links we infer (corporate parents, districts, similar contractors, connections between records) are Inferred, worded carefully, never asserted as fact and never a claim that one thing caused another. Spot an error? Tell us.