NAICS category

Landscape Architectural Services

NAICS 541320

FY2026 ended Sep 30 · data still posting · data as of 2026-11-01†

† DoD contract data posts to USAspending about 90 days after award.

Part of Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services →

$417M
Federal awards
FY2026 · data still posting
28
Recipients
NAICS 541320
Code

NAICS code 541320 (Landscape Architectural Services) accounted for $417M in federal contracts in FY2026, led by the Department of Defense, across 28 recipients. Its largest recipient on record was General Dynamics Corporation, with 14%. FY2026 ended Sep 30 and its data is still posting. Computed

Obligations by year

Computed
$29M
FY20
$22.4M
FY21
$32.2M
FY22
$47M
FY23
$49.8M
FY24
$119.3M
FY25
$417M
FY26 partial
▲ 312%
FY20 to FY25

Key takeaways

Computed
FY2026 ended Sep 30 · data still posting · data as of 2026-11-01
  • Landscape Architectural Services (NAICS 541320) accounted for $417M in federal obligations in FY2026, compared with $119.3M in FY2025.
  • The Department of Defense provided 33% of it.
  • Its largest recipient was General Dynamics Corporation, with 14%.

Top recipients

Computed

The five largest recipients on record received 63% of this category's FY2026 obligations, and the ten largest 83%.

General Dynamics Corporation$59.4M
Leidos, Inc.$58.9M
CACI International Inc$57.6M
Booz Allen Hamilton Inc$57.3M
Science Applications International Corporation$32.6M
Information Systems & Networks Corporation$21M
Amentum Services, Inc.$18.2M
Lmi Consulting, LLC$16.9M
ICF Incorporated, L.l.c.$15.6M
V2X Systems LLC$10M

Recipient breakdown available for 89% of obligations shown

Awards

Source

Largest FY2026 awards in this category

Awards coded NAICS 541320 that started in FY2026, by the amount obligated on each so far.

No award on record in this category started in FY2026.

Largest awards in this category

High-Resolution Three-Dimensional Geospatial Information (HR3DGI) Operations…
awarded 2025$59.6M

Total value over each award’s life, largest first.

Related

Why the labels? The graph is only worth anything if the links are trusted. Facts taken straight from a federal filing are Source; figures we calculate are Computed; links we infer (corporate parents, districts, similar contractors, connections between records) are Inferred, worded carefully, never asserted as fact and never a claim that one thing caused another. Spot an error? Tell us.